i5-520UM vs Celeron N3450

Aggregate performance score

Celeron N3450
2016
4 cores / 4 threads, 6 Watt
1.25
+119%
Core i5-520UM
2010
2 cores / 4 threads, 18 Watt
0.57

Celeron N3450 outperforms Core i5-520UM by a whopping 119% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Celeron N3450 and Core i5-520UM processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking22972813
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel CeleronIntel Core i5
Power efficiency19.723.00
Architecture codenameApollo Lake (2014−2016)Arrandale (2010−2011)
Release date30 August 2016 (8 years ago)7 January 2010 (14 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$107$241

Detailed specifications

Celeron N3450 and Core i5-520UM basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads44
Base clock speed1.1 GHz1.07 GHz
Boost clock speed2.2 GHz1.87 GHz
Bus typeno dataDMI 1.0
Bus rateno data1 × 2.5 GT/s
Multiplier118
L1 cacheno data128 KB
L2 cache2 MB512 KB
L3 cache0 KB3 MB
Chip lithography14 nm32 nm
Die sizeno data81+114 mm2
Maximum core temperature105 °C105 °C
Number of transistorsno data382+177 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Celeron N3450 and Core i5-520UM compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1 (Uniprocessor)
SocketFCBGA1296BGA1288
Power consumption (TDP)6 Watt18 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron N3450 and Core i5-520UM. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2
AES-NI++
FMA-+
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology-+
Hyper-Threading Technology-+
Idle States++
Thermal Monitoring++
Flex Memory Accessno data+
Smart Response-no data
PAEno data36 Bit
GPIO+no data
Smart Connect-no data
FDIno data+
Fast Memory Accessno data+
HD Audio+no data
RST-no data

Security technologies

Celeron N3450 and Core i5-520UM technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDB++
Secure Boot+no data
Secure Key+no data
MPX+-
Identity Protection+-
OS Guard+no data
Anti-Theft-no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron N3450 and Core i5-520UM are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
VT-i-no data
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron N3450 and Core i5-520UM. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3, DDR4DDR3-800
Maximum memory size8 GB8 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidthno data12.799 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel HD Graphics 500Intel® HD Graphics for Previous Generation Intel® Processors
Max video memory8 GBno data
Quick Sync Video+-
Clear Video++
Clear Video HD++
Graphics max frequency700 MHz500 MHz
Execution Units12no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Celeron N3450 and Core i5-520UM integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported32
eDP+no data
DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-
MIPI-DSI+no data

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Celeron N3450 and Core i5-520UM integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX+no data
OpenGL+no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron N3450 and Core i5-520UM.

PCIe version2.02.0
PCI Express lanes616
USB revision2.0/3.0no data
Total number of SATA ports2no data
Max number of SATA 6 Gb/s Ports2no data
Number of USB ports8no data
Integrated LAN-no data
UART+no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Celeron N3450 1.25
+119%
i5-520UM 0.57

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Celeron N3450 1987
+119%
i5-520UM 908

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

Celeron N3450 1415
i5-520UM 1943
+37.3%

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

Celeron N3450 3959
+4.8%
i5-520UM 3778

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

Celeron N3450 2576
+72.7%
i5-520UM 1492

wPrime 32

wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.

Celeron N3450 22.31
+57.6%
i5-520UM 35.15

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 11.5 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R11.5 which uses all the processor threads. A maximum of 64 threads is supported in this version.

Celeron N3450 2
+55.8%
i5-520UM 1

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.25 0.57
Recency 30 August 2016 7 January 2010
Physical cores 4 2
Chip lithography 14 nm 32 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 6 Watt 18 Watt

Celeron N3450 has a 119.3% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 6 years, 100% more physical cores, a 128.6% more advanced lithography process, and 200% lower power consumption.

The Celeron N3450 is our recommended choice as it beats the Core i5-520UM in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron N3450 and Core i5-520UM, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron N3450
Celeron N3450
Intel Core i5-520UM
Core i5-520UM

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 152 votes

Rate Celeron N3450 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
1 1 vote

Rate Core i5-520UM on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron N3450 or Core i5-520UM, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.