MediaTek Kompanio 520 vs Celeron N3350

VS

Aggregate performance score

Celeron N3350
2016
2 cores / 2 threads, 6 Watt
0.70
MediaTek Kompanio 520
8 cores / 8 threads, 2000 Watt
1.99
+184%

MediaTek Kompanio 520 outperforms Celeron N3350 by a whopping 184% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Celeron N3350 and MediaTek Kompanio 520 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking27051921
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel CeleronMediaTek Kompanio 500
Power efficiency11.040.09
Architecture codenameApollo Lake (2014−2016)2x Cortex-A76 / 6x A55
Release date30 August 2016 (8 years ago)no data (2024 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$24no data

Detailed specifications

Celeron N3350 and MediaTek Kompanio 520 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads28
Base clock speed1.1 GHzno data
Boost clock speed2.4 GHz2 GHz
Multiplier11no data
L2 cache1 MBno data
L3 cache0 KBno data
Chip lithography14 nm7 nm
Maximum core temperature105 °Cno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data

Compatibility

Information on Celeron N3350 and MediaTek Kompanio 520 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)no data
SocketFCBGA1296no data
Power consumption (TDP)6 Watt2000 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron N3350 and MediaTek Kompanio 520. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Smart Response-no data
GPIO+no data
Smart Connect-no data
HD Audio+no data
RST-no data

Security technologies

Celeron N3350 and MediaTek Kompanio 520 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data
Secure Boot+no data
Secure Key+no data
MPX+-
Identity Protection+-
OS Guard+no data
Anti-Theft-no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron N3350 and MediaTek Kompanio 520 are enumerated here.

VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
VT-i-no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron N3350 and MediaTek Kompanio 520. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3, DDR4no data
Maximum memory size8 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel HD Graphics 500no data
Max video memory8 GBno data
Quick Sync Video+-
Clear Video+no data
Clear Video HD+no data
Graphics max frequency650 MHzno data
Execution Units12no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Celeron N3350 and MediaTek Kompanio 520 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported3no data
eDP+no data
DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-
MIPI-DSI+no data

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Celeron N3350 and MediaTek Kompanio 520 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX+no data
OpenGL+no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron N3350 and MediaTek Kompanio 520.

PCIe version2.0no data
PCI Express lanes6no data
USB revision2.0/3.0no data
Total number of SATA ports2no data
Max number of SATA 6 Gb/s Ports2no data
Number of USB ports8no data
Integrated LAN-no data
UART+no data

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.70 1.99
Physical cores 2 8
Threads 2 8
Chip lithography 14 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 6 Watt 2000 Watt

Celeron N3350 has 33233.3% lower power consumption.

MediaTek Kompanio 520, on the other hand, has a 184.3% higher aggregate performance score, 300% more physical cores and 300% more threads, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

The MediaTek Kompanio 520 is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron N3350 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron N3350 and MediaTek Kompanio 520, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron N3350
Celeron N3350
MediaTek Kompanio 520
Kompanio 520

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.8 956 votes

Rate Celeron N3350 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.5 34 votes

Rate MediaTek Kompanio 520 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron N3350 or MediaTek Kompanio 520, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.