Ultra 7 165H vs Celeron N3050

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Celeron N3050
2015
2 cores / 2 threads, 6 Watt
0.37
Core Ultra 7 165H
2023
16 cores / 22 threads, 28 Watt
16.49
+4357%

Core Ultra 7 165H outperforms Celeron N3050 by a whopping 4357% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Celeron N3050 and Core Ultra 7 165H processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking3042402
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel CeleronIntel Meteor Lake-H
Power efficiency5.8455.73
Architecture codenameBraswell (2015−2016)Meteor Lake-H (2023)
Release date1 April 2015 (9 years ago)14 December 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$107$460

Detailed specifications

Celeron N3050 and Core Ultra 7 165H basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)16 (Hexadeca-Core)
Threads222
Base clock speed1.6 GHz3.8 GHz
Boost clock speed2.16 GHz5 GHz
Bus typeIDIno data
L1 cacheno data112 KB (per core)
L2 cache1 MB2 MB (per core)
L3 cache0 KB24 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm7 nm
Maximum core temperature90 °C110 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data

Compatibility

Information on Celeron N3050 and Core Ultra 7 165H compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
SocketFCBGA1170Intel BGA 2049
Power consumption (TDP)6 Watt28 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron N3050 and Core Ultra 7 165H. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
AVX-+
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
TSX-+
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Smart Response-no data
GPIO+no data
Smart Connect-no data
HD Audio+no data
RST-no data

Security technologies

Celeron N3050 and Core Ultra 7 165H technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-+
EDB+no data
Secure Boot+no data
Secure Key+no data
Identity Protection+-
OS Guard-no data
Anti-Theft-no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron N3050 and Core Ultra 7 165H are enumerated here.

VT-d-+
VT-x++
VT-i-no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron N3050 and Core Ultra 7 165H. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR5
Maximum memory size8 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
Intel HD Graphics for Intel Celeron Processor N3000 SeriesIntel Arc 8-Cores iGPU ( - 2300 MHz)
Max video memory8 GBno data
Quick Sync Video+-
Clear Video+no data
Clear Video HD+no data
Graphics max frequency600 MHzno data
Execution Units12no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Celeron N3050 and Core Ultra 7 165H integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported3no data
eDP+no data
DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Celeron N3050 and Core Ultra 7 165H integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX+no data
OpenGL+no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron N3050 and Core Ultra 7 165H.

PCIe version2.05.0
PCI Express lanes48
USB revision2.0/3.0no data
Total number of SATA ports2no data
Max number of SATA 6 Gb/s Ports2no data
Number of USB ports5no data
Integrated LAN-no data
UART+no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Celeron N3050 0.37
Ultra 7 165H 16.49
+4357%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Celeron N3050 588
Ultra 7 165H 26191
+4354%

Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 15 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R15 which uses all the processor threads.

Celeron N3050 63
Ultra 7 165H 2641
+4126%

Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R15 (standing for Release 15) is a benchmark made by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version (sometimes called Single-Thread) only uses a single processor thread to render a room full of reflective spheres and light sources.

Celeron N3050 34
Ultra 7 165H 257
+656%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.37 16.49
Integrated graphics card 0.77 18.48
Recency 1 April 2015 14 December 2023
Physical cores 2 16
Threads 2 22
Chip lithography 14 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 6 Watt 28 Watt

Celeron N3050 has 366.7% lower power consumption.

Ultra 7 165H, on the other hand, has a 4356.8% higher aggregate performance score, 2300% faster integrated GPU, an age advantage of 8 years, 700% more physical cores and 1000% more threads, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

The Core Ultra 7 165H is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron N3050 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron N3050 and Core Ultra 7 165H, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron N3050
Celeron N3050
Intel Core Ultra 7 165H
Core Ultra 7 165H

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.6 552 votes

Rate Celeron N3050 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 44 votes

Rate Core Ultra 7 165H on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron N3050 or Core Ultra 7 165H, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.