i3-1115G4 vs Celeron N2840

VS

Primary details

Comparing Celeron N2840 and Core i3-1115G4 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot rated1462
Place by popularitynot in top-10055
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel CeleronIntel Tiger Lake
Power efficiencyno data12.90
Architecture codenameBay Trail-M (2013−2014)Tiger Lake-UP3 (2020−2021)
Release date22 May 2014 (10 years ago)2 September 2020 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Celeron N2840 and Core i3-1115G4 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads24
Base clock speed2.16 GHz3 GHz
Boost clock speed2.58 GHz4.1 GHz
Bus rateno data4 GT/s
L1 cache56K (per core)96K (per core)
L2 cache512K (per core)1.25 MB (per core)
L3 cache0 KB6 MB (shared)
Chip lithography22 nm10 nm SuperFin
Maximum core temperature100 °C100 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data72 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+

Compatibility

Information on Celeron N2840 and Core i3-1115G4 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCBGA1170FCBGA1449
Power consumption (TDP)7.5 Watt28 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron N2840 and Core i3-1115G4. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512
AES-NI-+
FMA-+
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shiftno data+
Turbo Boost Technology-2.0
Hyper-Threading Technology-+
TSX-+
Idle States++
Thermal Monitoring-+
Smart Connect+no data
Deep Learning Boost-+

Security technologies

Celeron N2840 and Core i3-1115G4 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+
EDB+no data
Secure Key+no data
SGXno data-
OS Guardno data+
Anti-Theft-no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron N2840 and Core i3-1115G4 are enumerated here.

VT-d-+
VT-x++
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron N2840 and Core i3-1115G4. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR4
Maximum memory size8 GB64 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidth21.32 GB/sno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel® HD Graphics for Intel Atom® Processor Z3700 SeriesIntel® UHD Graphics for 11th Gen Intel® Processors
Quick Sync Video++
Clear Video HD-+
Graphics max frequency792 MHz1.25 GHz
Execution Unitsno data48

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Celeron N2840 and Core i3-1115G4 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported24

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Celeron N2840 and Core i3-1115G4 integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

Max resolution over HDMI 1.4no data4096x2304@60Hz
Max resolution over eDPno data4096x2304@60Hz
Max resolution over DisplayPortno data7680x4320@60Hz

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Celeron N2840 and Core i3-1115G4 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXno data12.1
OpenGLno data4.6

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron N2840 and Core i3-1115G4.

PCIe version2.04.0
PCI Express lanes416
USB revision3.0 and 2.0no data
Total number of SATA ports2no data
Number of USB ports5no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.



Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Celeron N2840 587
i3-1115G4 6054
+931%

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Celeron N2840 178
i3-1115G4 1563
+778%

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Celeron N2840 297
i3-1115G4 3049
+927%

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

Celeron N2840 1331
i3-1115G4 8018
+502%

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

Celeron N2840 2533
i3-1115G4 16265
+542%

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

Celeron N2840 1510
i3-1115G4 6331
+319%

Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 15 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R15 which uses all the processor threads.

Celeron N2840 76
i3-1115G4 481
+532%

Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R15 (standing for Release 15) is a benchmark made by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version (sometimes called Single-Thread) only uses a single processor thread to render a room full of reflective spheres and light sources.

Celeron N2840 38
i3-1115G4 190
+400%

Pros & cons summary


Recency 22 May 2014 2 September 2020
Threads 2 4
Chip lithography 22 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 7 Watt 28 Watt

Celeron N2840 has 300% lower power consumption.

i3-1115G4, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 6 years, 100% more threads, and a 120% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Celeron N2840 and Core i3-1115G4. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron N2840 and Core i3-1115G4, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron N2840
Celeron N2840
Intel Core i3-1115G4
Core i3-1115G4

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.6 634 votes

Rate Celeron N2840 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 5325 votes

Rate Core i3-1115G4 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron N2840 or Core i3-1115G4, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.