Turion 64 MT-30 vs Celeron N2810
Aggregate performance score
Celeron N2810 outperforms Turion 64 MT-30 by a substantial 33% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing Celeron N2810 and Turion 64 MT-30 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
Place in the ranking | 3166 | 3248 |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
Series | Intel Celeron | Turion 64 |
Power efficiency | 3.24 | 0.68 |
Architecture codename | Bay Trail-M (2013−2014) | Lancaster (2005−2006) |
Release date | 11 September 2013 (11 years ago) | March 2005 (19 years ago) |
Launch price (MSRP) | $260 | no data |
Detailed specifications
Celeron N2810 and Turion 64 MT-30 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 1 (Single-Core) |
Threads | 2 | 1 |
Base clock speed | 2 GHz | no data |
Boost clock speed | 2 GHz | 1.6 GHz |
Bus rate | no data | 800 MHz |
L1 cache | 56K (per core) | 128 KB |
L2 cache | 512K (per core) | 1 MB |
L3 cache | 0 KB | 0 KB |
Chip lithography | 22 nm | 90 nm |
Die size | no data | 125 mm2 |
Maximum core temperature | 100 °C | no data |
Number of transistors | no data | 114 million |
64 bit support | + | + |
Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Compatibility
Information on Celeron N2810 and Turion 64 MT-30 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
Socket | FCBGA1170 | 754 |
Power consumption (TDP) | 7.5 Watt | 25 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron N2810 and Turion 64 MT-30. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
PowerNow | - | + |
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | no data |
Turbo Boost Technology | - | no data |
Hyper-Threading Technology | - | no data |
Idle States | + | no data |
Smart Connect | + | no data |
RST | - | no data |
Security technologies
Celeron N2810 and Turion 64 MT-30 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
EDB | + | no data |
Anti-Theft | - | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron N2810 and Turion 64 MT-30 are enumerated here.
VT-d | - | no data |
VT-x | + | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron N2810 and Turion 64 MT-30. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
Supported memory types | DDR3 | no data |
Maximum memory size | 8 GB | no data |
Max memory channels | 2 | no data |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
Integrated graphics card | Intel HD Graphics for Intel Atom Processor Z3700 Series | no data |
Graphics max frequency | 756 MHz | no data |
Graphics interfaces
Available interfaces and connections of Celeron N2810 and Turion 64 MT-30 integrated GPUs.
Number of displays supported | 2 | no data |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron N2810 and Turion 64 MT-30.
PCIe version | 2.0 | no data |
PCI Express lanes | 4 | no data |
USB revision | 3.0 and 2.0 | no data |
Total number of SATA ports | 2 | no data |
Number of USB ports | 5 | no data |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
wPrime 32
wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.
Pros & cons summary
Performance score | 0.24 | 0.18 |
Physical cores | 2 | 1 |
Threads | 2 | 1 |
Chip lithography | 22 nm | 90 nm |
Power consumption (TDP) | 7 Watt | 25 Watt |
Celeron N2810 has a 33.3% higher aggregate performance score, 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, a 309.1% more advanced lithography process, and 257.1% lower power consumption.
The Celeron N2810 is our recommended choice as it beats the Turion 64 MT-30 in performance tests.
Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron N2810 and Turion 64 MT-30, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.