Mobile Sempron 3300+ vs Celeron N2810

Primary details

Comparing Celeron N2810 and Mobile Sempron 3300+ processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel CeleronAMD Mobile Sempron
Architecture codenameBay Trail-M (2013−2014)Roma (2005)
Release date11 September 2013 (11 years ago)1 June 2005 (19 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$260no data

Detailed specifications

Celeron N2810 and Mobile Sempron 3300+ basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads21
Base clock speed2 GHzno data
Boost clock speed2 GHz2 GHz
Bus rateno data800 MHz
L1 cache56K (per core)no data
L2 cache512K (per core)128 KB
L3 cache0 KBno data
Chip lithography22 nm90 nm
Maximum core temperature100 °Cno data
64 bit support+-
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Celeron N2810 and Mobile Sempron 3300+ compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1no data
SocketFCBGA1170745
Power consumption (TDP)7.5 Watt62/25 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron N2810 and Mobile Sempron 3300+. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataMMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3 (Roma Core), Enhanced 3DNow!, NX bit
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Idle States+no data
Smart Connect+no data
RST-no data

Security technologies

Celeron N2810 and Mobile Sempron 3300+ technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

EDB+no data
Anti-Theft-no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron N2810 and Mobile Sempron 3300+ are enumerated here.

VT-d-no data
VT-x+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron N2810 and Mobile Sempron 3300+. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3no data
Maximum memory size8 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel® HD Graphics for Intel Atom® Processor Z3700 Seriesno data
Graphics max frequency756 MHzno data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Celeron N2810 and Mobile Sempron 3300+ integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported2no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron N2810 and Mobile Sempron 3300+.

PCIe version2.0no data
PCI Express lanes4no data
USB revision3.0 and 2.0no data
Total number of SATA ports2no data
Number of USB ports5no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.



Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Celeron N2810 377
+28.2%
Mobile Sempron 3300+ 294

wPrime 32

wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.

Celeron N2810 63.4
+32.5%
Mobile Sempron 3300+ 84

Pros & cons summary


Recency 11 September 2013 1 June 2005
Physical cores 2 1
Threads 2 1
Chip lithography 22 nm 90 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 7 Watt 62 Watt

Celeron N2810 has an age advantage of 8 years, 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, a 309.1% more advanced lithography process, and 785.7% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Celeron N2810 and Mobile Sempron 3300+. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron N2810 and Mobile Sempron 3300+, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron N2810
Celeron N2810
AMD Mobile Sempron 3300+
Mobile Sempron 3300+

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.9 41 vote

Rate Celeron N2810 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Mobile Sempron 3300 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron N2810 or Mobile Sempron 3300+, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.