Celeron 827 vs N2808
Primary details
Comparing Celeron N2808 and Celeron 827 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
Place in the ranking | 3097 | not rated |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
Series | Intel Celeron | Intel Celeron |
Power efficiency | 7.57 | no data |
Architecture codename | Bay Trail-M (2013−2014) | Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) |
Release date | 22 May 2014 (10 years ago) | no data |
Detailed specifications
Celeron N2808 and Celeron 827 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 1 (Single-Core) |
Threads | 2 | 1 |
Base clock speed | 1.58 GHz | no data |
Boost clock speed | 2.25 GHz | 1.4 GHz |
Bus type | no data | DMI 2.0 |
Bus rate | no data | 4 × 5 GT/s |
Multiplier | no data | 14 |
L1 cache | 56K (per core) | 64 KB |
L2 cache | 512K (per core) | 256 KB |
L3 cache | 0 KB | 1.5 MB |
Chip lithography | 22 nm | 32 nm |
Die size | no data | 131 mm2 |
Maximum core temperature | 100 °C | no data |
Number of transistors | no data | 504 Million |
64 bit support | + | + |
Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Compatibility
Information on Celeron N2808 and Celeron 827 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 (Uniprocessor) |
Socket | FCBGA1170 | no data |
Power consumption (TDP) | 4.5 Watt | 17 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron N2808 and Celeron 827. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
FMA | - | + |
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | + |
Turbo Boost Technology | - | no data |
Hyper-Threading Technology | - | no data |
Idle States | + | no data |
Smart Connect | + | no data |
Security technologies
Celeron N2808 and Celeron 827 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
EDB | + | no data |
Secure Key | + | no data |
Anti-Theft | - | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron N2808 and Celeron 827 are enumerated here.
VT-d | - | no data |
VT-x | + | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron N2808 and Celeron 827. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
Supported memory types | DDR3 | DDR3-1333 |
Maximum memory size | 4 GB | 16 GB |
Max memory channels | 1 | 2 |
Maximum memory bandwidth | 10.66 GB/s | 21.335 GB/s |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
Integrated graphics card Compare | Intel HD Graphics for Intel Atom Processor Z3700 Series | Intel HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge) |
Quick Sync Video | + | - |
Graphics max frequency | 792 MHz | no data |
Graphics interfaces
Available interfaces and connections of Celeron N2808 and Celeron 827 integrated GPUs.
Number of displays supported | 2 | no data |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron N2808 and Celeron 827.
PCIe version | 2.0 | no data |
PCI Express lanes | 4 | no data |
USB revision | 3.0 and 2.0 | no data |
Total number of SATA ports | 2 | no data |
Number of USB ports | 5 | no data |
Pros & cons summary
Integrated graphics card | 0.77 | 0.34 |
Physical cores | 2 | 1 |
Threads | 2 | 1 |
Chip lithography | 22 nm | 32 nm |
Power consumption (TDP) | 4 Watt | 17 Watt |
Celeron N2808 has 126.5% faster integrated GPU, 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, a 45.5% more advanced lithography process, and 325% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Celeron N2808 and Celeron 827. We've got no test results to judge.
Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron N2808 and Celeron 827, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.