Celeron 817 vs N2808

Primary details

Comparing Celeron N2808 and Celeron 817 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking	3097	not rated
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Market segment	Laptop	Laptop
Series	Intel Celeron	Intel Celeron
Power efficiency	7.57	no data
Architecture codename	Bay Trail-M (2013−2014)	Sandy Bridge (2011−2013)
Release date	22 May 2014 (10 years ago)	no data

Detailed specifications

Celeron N2808 and Celeron 817 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores	2 (Dual-core)	2 (Dual-core)
Threads	2	2
Base clock speed	1.58 GHz	no data
Boost clock speed	2.25 GHz	1.6 GHz
Bus type	no data	DMI 2.0
Bus rate	no data	4 × 5 GT/s
Multiplier	no data	16
L1 cache	56K (per core)	128 KB
L2 cache	512K (per core)	512 KB
L3 cache	0 KB	2 MB
Chip lithography	22 nm	32 nm
Die size	no data	131 mm2
Maximum core temperature	100 °C	no data
Number of transistors	no data	504 Million
64 bit support	+	+
Windows 11 compatibility	-	-

Compatibility

Information on Celeron N2808 and Celeron 817 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration	1	1 (Uniprocessor)
Socket	FCBGA1170	no data
Power consumption (TDP)	4.5 Watt	17 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron N2808 and Celeron 817. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

FMA	-	+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)	+	+
Turbo Boost Technology	-	no data
Hyper-Threading Technology	-	no data
Idle States	+	no data
Smart Connect	+	no data

Security technologies

Celeron N2808 and Celeron 817 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

EDB	+	no data
Secure Key	+	no data
Anti-Theft	-	no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron N2808 and Celeron 817 are enumerated here.

VT-d	-	no data
VT-x	+	+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron N2808 and Celeron 817. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory types	DDR3	no data
Maximum memory size	4 GB	16 GB
Max memory channels	1	no data
Maximum memory bandwidth	10.66 GB/s	21.335 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card Compare	Intel HD Graphics for Intel Atom Processor Z3700 Series	Intel HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge)
Quick Sync Video	+	-
Graphics max frequency	792 MHz	no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Celeron N2808 and Celeron 817 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported

2

no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron N2808 and Celeron 817.

PCIe version	2.0	no data
PCI Express lanes	4	no data
USB revision	3.0 and 2.0	no data
Total number of SATA ports	2	no data
Number of USB ports	5	no data

Pros & cons summary

---

Integrated graphics card	0.77	0.34
Chip lithography	22 nm	32 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	4 Watt	17 Watt

---

Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron N2808 and Celeron 817, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.

---