i3-1115G4 vs Celeron N2806

VS

Aggregate performance score

Celeron N2806
2013
2 cores / 2 threads, 4 Watt
0.31
Core i3-1115G4
2020
2 cores / 4 threads, 28 Watt
3.80
+1126%

Core i3-1115G4 outperforms Celeron N2806 by a whopping 1126% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Celeron N2806 and Core i3-1115G4 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking31071479
Place by popularitynot in top-10047
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel CeleronIntel Tiger Lake
Power efficiency7.3312.84
Architecture codenameBay Trail-M (2013−2014)Tiger Lake-UP3 (2020−2021)
Release date1 December 2013 (11 years ago)2 September 2020 (4 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$107no data

Detailed specifications

Celeron N2806 and Core i3-1115G4 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads24
Base clock speed1.6 GHz3 GHz
Boost clock speed2 GHz4.1 GHz
Bus rateno data4 GT/s
L1 cache56K (per core)96K (per core)
L2 cache512K (per core)1.25 MB (per core)
L3 cache0 KB6 MB (shared)
Chip lithography22 nm10 nm SuperFin
Maximum core temperature105 °C100 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data72 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+

Compatibility

Information on Celeron N2806 and Core i3-1115G4 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCBGA1170FCBGA1449
Power consumption (TDP)4.5 Watt28 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron N2806 and Core i3-1115G4. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512
AES-NI-+
FMA-+
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shiftno data+
Turbo Boost Technology-2.0
Hyper-Threading Technology-+
TSX-+
Idle States++
Thermal Monitoring-+
Smart Connect+no data
RST-no data
Deep Learning Boost-+

Security technologies

Celeron N2806 and Core i3-1115G4 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+
EDB+no data
SGXno data-
OS Guardno data+
Anti-Theft-no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron N2806 and Core i3-1115G4 are enumerated here.

VT-d-+
VT-x++
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron N2806 and Core i3-1115G4. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR4
Maximum memory size4 GB64 GB
Max memory channels12

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
Intel HD Graphics for Intel Atom Processor Z3700 SeriesIntel UHD Graphics for 11th Gen Intel Processors
Quick Sync Video-+
Clear Video HD-+
Graphics max frequency756 MHz1.25 GHz
Execution Unitsno data48

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Celeron N2806 and Core i3-1115G4 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported24

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Celeron N2806 and Core i3-1115G4 integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

Max resolution over HDMI 1.4no data4096x2304@60Hz
Max resolution over eDPno data4096x2304@60Hz
Max resolution over DisplayPortno data7680x4320@60Hz

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Celeron N2806 and Core i3-1115G4 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXno data12.1
OpenGLno data4.6

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron N2806 and Core i3-1115G4.

PCIe version2.04.0
PCI Express lanes416
USB revision3.0 and 2.0no data
Total number of SATA ports2no data
Number of USB ports5no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Celeron N2806 0.31
i3-1115G4 3.80
+1126%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Celeron N2806 489
i3-1115G4 6034
+1134%

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

Celeron N2806 1195
i3-1115G4 6331
+430%

Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 15 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R15 which uses all the processor threads.

Celeron N2806 58
i3-1115G4 481
+728%

Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R15 (standing for Release 15) is a benchmark made by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version (sometimes called Single-Thread) only uses a single processor thread to render a room full of reflective spheres and light sources.

Celeron N2806 26
i3-1115G4 190
+631%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.31 3.80
Integrated graphics card 0.77 5.58
Recency 1 December 2013 2 September 2020
Threads 2 4
Chip lithography 22 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 4 Watt 28 Watt

Celeron N2806 has 600% lower power consumption.

i3-1115G4, on the other hand, has a 1125.8% higher aggregate performance score, 624.7% faster integrated GPU, an age advantage of 6 years, 100% more threads, and a 120% more advanced lithography process.

The Core i3-1115G4 is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron N2806 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron N2806 and Core i3-1115G4, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron N2806
Celeron N2806
Intel Core i3-1115G4
Core i3-1115G4

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.1 28 votes

Rate Celeron N2806 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 5421 vote

Rate Core i3-1115G4 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron N2806 or Core i3-1115G4, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.