Turion 64 X2 TL-60 vs Celeron M P4600

VS

Aggregate performance score

Celeron M P4600
2010
2 cores / 2 threads, 35 Watt
0.56
+21.7%
Turion 64 X2 TL-60
2007
2 cores / 2 threads, 35 Watt
0.46

Celeron M P4600 outperforms Turion 64 X2 TL-60 by a significant 22% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Celeron M P4600 and Turion 64 X2 TL-60 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking28392933
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel Celeron M2x AMD Turion 64
Power efficiency1.511.24
Architecture codenameArrandale (2010−2011)Trinidad/Tyler (2007)
Release date1 October 2010 (14 years ago)4 May 2007 (17 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$86no data

Detailed specifications

Celeron M P4600 and Turion 64 X2 TL-60 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads22
Boost clock speed2 GHz2 GHz
Bus rate2500 MHz800 MHz
L1 cache128 KB256 KB
L2 cache512 KB1 MB
L3 cache2 MBno data
Chip lithography32 nm90 nm
Die size81+114 mm2147 mm2
Maximum core temperature90 °C95 °C
Number of transistors382+177 Million154 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Celeron M P4600 and Turion 64 X2 TL-60 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

SocketPGA988S1
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt35/31 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron M P4600 and Turion 64 X2 TL-60. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno data90/65 nm, 1.075
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-

Security technologies

Celeron M P4600 and Turion 64 X2 TL-60 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron M P4600 and Turion 64 X2 TL-60 are enumerated here.

VT-x+no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Celeron M P4600 0.56
+21.7%
Turion 64 X2 TL-60 0.46

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

Celeron M P4600 1886
+16.5%
Turion 64 X2 TL-60 1619

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

Celeron M P4600 4213
+34.6%
Turion 64 X2 TL-60 3130

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

Celeron M P4600 1804
+23.8%
Turion 64 X2 TL-60 1457

wPrime 32

wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.

Celeron M P4600 34.29
+13.7%
Turion 64 X2 TL-60 39

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.56 0.46
Recency 1 October 2010 4 May 2007
Chip lithography 32 nm 90 nm

Celeron M P4600 has a 21.7% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 3 years, and a 181.3% more advanced lithography process.

The Celeron M P4600 is our recommended choice as it beats the Turion 64 X2 TL-60 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron M P4600 and Turion 64 X2 TL-60, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron M P4600
Celeron M P4600
AMD Turion 64 X2 TL-60
Turion 64 X2 TL-60

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.3 3 votes

Rate Celeron M P4600 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 106 votes

Rate Turion 64 X2 TL-60 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron M P4600 or Turion 64 X2 TL-60, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.