Turion 64 X2 TL-60 vs Celeron M P4600
Primary details
Comparing Celeron M P4600 and Turion 64 X2 TL-60 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 2824 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Series | Intel Celeron M | 2x AMD Turion 64 |
| Power efficiency | 1.51 | no data |
| Architecture codename | Arrandale (2010−2011) | Trinidad/Tyler (2007) |
| Release date | 1 October 2010 (14 years ago) | 4 May 2007 (17 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $86 | no data |
Detailed specifications
Celeron M P4600 and Turion 64 X2 TL-60 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 2 (Dual-core) |
| Threads | 2 | 2 |
| Boost clock speed | 2 GHz | 2 GHz |
| Bus rate | 2500 MHz | 800 MHz |
| L1 cache | 128 KB | 256 KB |
| L2 cache | 512 KB | 1 MB |
| L3 cache | 2 MB | no data |
| Chip lithography | 32 nm | 90 nm |
| Die size | 81+114 mm2 | 147 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | 90 °C | 95 °C |
| Number of transistors | 382+177 Million | 154 Million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Compatibility
Information on Celeron M P4600 and Turion 64 X2 TL-60 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Socket | PGA988 | S1 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | 35/31 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron M P4600 and Turion 64 X2 TL-60. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | no data | 90/65 nm, 1.075 |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | no data |
| Thermal Monitoring | + | - |
Security technologies
Celeron M P4600 and Turion 64 X2 TL-60 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| EDB | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron M P4600 and Turion 64 X2 TL-60 are enumerated here.
| VT-x | + | no data |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core
Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.
Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core
Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.
3DMark06 CPU
3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.
wPrime 32
wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 1 October 2010 | 4 May 2007 |
| Chip lithography | 32 nm | 90 nm |
Celeron M P4600 has an age advantage of 3 years, and a 181.3% more advanced lithography process.
We couldn't decide between Celeron M P4600 and Turion 64 X2 TL-60. We've got no test results to judge.
Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron M P4600 and Turion 64 X2 TL-60, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
