EPYC 9634 vs Celeron M P4600

VS

Aggregate performance score

Celeron M P4600
2010
2 cores / 2 threads, 35 Watt
0.58
EPYC 9634
2022
84 cores / 168 threads, 290 Watt
70.53
+12060%

EPYC 9634 outperforms Celeron M P4600 by a whopping 12060% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Celeron M P4600 and EPYC 9634 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking28199
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data1.98
Market segmentLaptopServer
SeriesIntel Celeron MAMD EPYC
Power efficiency1.5122.18
Architecture codenameArrandale (2010−2011)Genoa (2022−2023)
Release date1 October 2010 (14 years ago)10 November 2022 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$86$10,304

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Celeron M P4600 and EPYC 9634 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)84
Threads2168
Base clock speedno data2.25 GHz
Boost clock speed2 GHz2.25 GHz
Bus rate2500 MHzno data
Multiplierno data22.5
L1 cache128 KB5376 KB
L2 cache512 KB84 MB
L3 cache2 MB384 MB (shared)
Chip lithography32 nm5 nm, 6 nm
Die size81+114 mm212x 72 mm2
Maximum core temperature90 °Cno data
Number of transistors382+177 Million78,840 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data

Compatibility

Information on Celeron M P4600 and EPYC 9634 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data2
SocketPGA988SP5
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt290 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron M P4600 and EPYC 9634. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI-+
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Precision Boost 2no data+

Security technologies

Celeron M P4600 and EPYC 9634 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron M P4600 and EPYC 9634 are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-x+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron M P4600 and EPYC 9634. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR5-4800
Maximum memory sizeno data6 TiB
Maximum memory bandwidthno data460.8 GB/s

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron M P4600 and EPYC 9634.

PCIe versionno data5.0
PCI Express lanesno data128

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.58 70.53
Recency 1 October 2010 10 November 2022
Physical cores 2 84
Threads 2 168
Chip lithography 32 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 290 Watt

Celeron M P4600 has 728.6% lower power consumption.

EPYC 9634, on the other hand, has a 12060.3% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 12 years, 4100% more physical cores and 8300% more threads, and a 540% more advanced lithography process.

The EPYC 9634 is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron M P4600 in performance tests.

Be aware that Celeron M P4600 is a notebook processor while EPYC 9634 is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron M P4600 and EPYC 9634, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron M P4600
Celeron M P4600
AMD EPYC 9634
EPYC 9634

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.3 3 votes

Rate Celeron M P4600 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 6 votes

Rate EPYC 9634 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron M P4600 or EPYC 9634, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.