Celeron Dual-Core SU2300 vs M P4600
Primary details
Comparing Celeron M P4600 and Celeron Dual-Core SU2300 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 2824 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Series | Intel Celeron M | Intel Celeron Dual-Core |
| Power efficiency | 1.51 | no data |
| Architecture codename | Arrandale (2010−2011) | Penryn (2008−2011) |
| Release date | 1 October 2010 (14 years ago) | 1 September 2009 (15 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $86 | $134 |
Detailed specifications
Celeron M P4600 and Celeron Dual-Core SU2300 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 2 (Dual-core) |
| Threads | 2 | 2 |
| Boost clock speed | 2 GHz | 1.2 GHz |
| Bus rate | 2500 MHz | 800 MHz |
| L1 cache | 128 KB | no data |
| L2 cache | 512 KB | 1 MB |
| L3 cache | 2 MB | no data |
| Chip lithography | 32 nm | 45 nm |
| Die size | 81+114 mm2 | 107 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | 90 °C | 100 °C |
| Number of transistors | 382+177 Million | 410 Million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Compatibility
Information on Celeron M P4600 and Celeron Dual-Core SU2300 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Socket | PGA988 | BGA956 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | 10 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron M P4600 and Celeron Dual-Core SU2300. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | + |
| Thermal Monitoring | + | + |
Security technologies
Celeron M P4600 and Celeron Dual-Core SU2300 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| EDB | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron M P4600 and Celeron Dual-Core SU2300 are enumerated here.
| VT-x | + | no data |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core
Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.
Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core
Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.
3DMark06 CPU
3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 1 October 2010 | 1 September 2009 |
| Chip lithography | 32 nm | 45 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | 10 Watt |
Celeron M P4600 has an age advantage of 1 year, and a 40.6% more advanced lithography process.
Celeron Dual-Core SU2300, on the other hand, has 250% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Celeron M P4600 and Celeron Dual-Core SU2300. We've got no test results to judge.
Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron M P4600 and Celeron Dual-Core SU2300, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
