C-60 vs Celeron M 743
Aggregate performance score
C-60 outperforms Celeron M 743 by a substantial 33% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing Celeron M 743 and C-60 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
Place in the ranking | 3320 | 3232 |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
Series | Intel Celeron M | AMD C-Series |
Power efficiency | 1.42 | 2.10 |
Architecture codename | Penryn (2008−2011) | Ontario (2011−2012) |
Release date | 1 September 2009 (15 years ago) | 22 August 2011 (13 years ago) |
Launch price (MSRP) | $107 | no data |
Detailed specifications
Celeron M 743 and C-60 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
Physical cores | 1 (Single-Core) | 2 (Dual-core) |
Threads | 1 | 2 |
Base clock speed | no data | 1 GHz |
Boost clock speed | 1.3 GHz | 1.33 GHz |
Bus rate | 800 MHz | no data |
L1 cache | 64 KB | 64K (per core) |
L2 cache | 1 MB | 512K (per core) |
L3 cache | no data | 0 KB |
Chip lithography | 45 nm | 40 nm |
Die size | 107 mm2 | 75 mm2 |
Maximum core temperature | 100 °C | no data |
Number of transistors | 410 Million | no data |
64 bit support | + | + |
Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Compatibility
Information on Celeron M 743 and C-60 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
Number of CPUs in a configuration | no data | 1 |
Socket | BGA965 | FT1 BGA 413-Ball |
Power consumption (TDP) | 10 Watt | 9 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron M 743 and C-60. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
Instruction set extensions | no data | MMX(+), SSE(1,2,3,3S,4A), AMD-V, Radeon HD 6290 (276-400 MHz) |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron M 743 and C-60 are enumerated here.
AMD-V | - | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron M 743 and C-60. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
Supported memory types | no data | DDR3 Single-channel |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
Integrated graphics card | no data | AMD Radeon HD 6290 |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
- Other tests
- Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core
- 3DMark06 CPU
- wPrime 32
Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core
Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.
3DMark06 CPU
3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.
wPrime 32
wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.
Pros & cons summary
Performance score | 0.15 | 0.20 |
Recency | 1 September 2009 | 22 August 2011 |
Physical cores | 1 | 2 |
Threads | 1 | 2 |
Chip lithography | 45 nm | 40 nm |
Power consumption (TDP) | 10 Watt | 9 Watt |
C-60 has a 33.3% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 1 year, 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, a 12.5% more advanced lithography process, and 11.1% lower power consumption.
The C-60 is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron M 743 in performance tests.
Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron M 743 and C-60, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.