C-60 vs Celeron M 743

VS

Aggregate performance score

Celeron M 743
2009
1 core / 1 thread, 10 Watt
0.15
C-60
2011
2 cores / 2 threads, 9 Watt
0.20
+33.3%

C-60 outperforms Celeron M 743 by a substantial 33% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Celeron M 743 and C-60 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking33203232
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel Celeron MAMD C-Series
Power efficiency1.422.10
Architecture codenamePenryn (2008−2011)Ontario (2011−2012)
Release date1 September 2009 (15 years ago)22 August 2011 (13 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$107no data

Detailed specifications

Celeron M 743 and C-60 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads12
Base clock speedno data1 GHz
Boost clock speed1.3 GHz1.33 GHz
Bus rate800 MHzno data
L1 cache64 KB64K (per core)
L2 cache1 MB512K (per core)
L3 cacheno data0 KB
Chip lithography45 nm40 nm
Die size107 mm275 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °Cno data
Number of transistors410 Millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Celeron M 743 and C-60 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
SocketBGA965FT1 BGA 413-Ball
Power consumption (TDP)10 Watt9 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron M 743 and C-60. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataMMX(+), SSE(1,2,3,3S,4A), AMD-V, Radeon HD 6290 (276-400 MHz)

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron M 743 and C-60 are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron M 743 and C-60. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR3 Single-channel

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataAMD Radeon HD 6290

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Celeron M 743 0.15
C-60 0.20
+33.3%

  • Other tests
    • Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core
    • 3DMark06 CPU
    • wPrime 32

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

Celeron M 743 1324
+72.5%
C-60 768

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

Celeron M 743 582
C-60 753
+29.5%

wPrime 32

wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.

Celeron M 743 121.8
C-60 86.15
+41.4%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.15 0.20
Recency 1 September 2009 22 August 2011
Physical cores 1 2
Threads 1 2
Chip lithography 45 nm 40 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 10 Watt 9 Watt

C-60 has a 33.3% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 1 year, 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, a 12.5% more advanced lithography process, and 11.1% lower power consumption.

The C-60 is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron M 743 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron M 743 and C-60, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron M 743
Celeron M 743
AMD C-60
C-60

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3
23 votes

Rate Celeron M 743 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.1
244 votes

Rate C-60 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron M 743 or C-60, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.