Core i5-12400F vs Celeron M 585

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing Celeron M 585 and Core i5-12400F processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance rankingnot rated565
Place by popularitynot in top-1004
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data85.21
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
SeriesIntel Celeron Mno data
Architecture codenameMerom (2006−2008)Alder Lake-S (2022)
Release date20 August 2008 (15 years ago)4 January 2022 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$70no data
Current price$15.56 (0.2x MSRP)$110

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Celeron M 585 and Core i5-12400F basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)6 (Hexa-Core)
Threads112
Base clock speedno data2.5 GHz
Boost clock speed2.16 GHz4.4 GHz
Bus support667 MHzno data
L1 cacheno data80K (per core)
L2 cache1 MB1.25 MB (per core)
L3 cacheno data18 MB (shared)
Chip lithography65 nmIntel 7 nm
Die size143 mm2163 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data100 °C
Number of transistors291 Millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on Celeron M 585 and Core i5-12400F compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
SocketPPGA478FCLGA1700
Power consumption (TDP)31 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron M 585 and Core i5-12400F. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2
AES-NIno data+
AVXno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Speed Shiftno data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data2.0
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data+
TSXno data+
Idle Statesno data+
Thermal Monitoringno data+
Turbo Boost Max 3.0no data-
Statusno dataLaunched

Security technologies

Celeron M 585 and Core i5-12400F technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+
EDBno data+
Secure Keyno data+
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron M 585 and Core i5-12400F are enumerated here.

VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron M 585 and Core i5-12400F. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR5-4800, DDR4-3200
Maximum memory sizeno data128 GB
Max memory channelsno data2
Maximum memory bandwidthno data76.8 GB/s

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron M 585 and Core i5-12400F.

PCIe versionno data5.0 and 4.0
PCI Express lanesno data20

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Celeron M 585 678
i5-12400F 19545
+2783%

Core i5-12400F outperforms Celeron M 585 by 2783% in Passmark.

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

Benchmark coverage: 20%

Celeron M 585 2062
i5-12400F 8389
+307%

Core i5-12400F outperforms Celeron M 585 by 307% in Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core.

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

Benchmark coverage: 19%

Celeron M 585 2062
i5-12400F 40690
+1873%

Core i5-12400F outperforms Celeron M 585 by 1873% in Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core.

Pros & cons summary


Recency 20 August 2008 4 January 2022
Physical cores 1 6
Threads 1 12
Power consumption (TDP) 31 Watt 65 Watt

We couldn't decide between Celeron M 585 and Core i5-12400F. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Celeron M 585 is a notebook processor while Core i5-12400F is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron M 585 and Core i5-12400F, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron M 585
Celeron M 585
Intel Core i5-12400F
Core i5-12400F

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


1.8 4 votes

Rate Celeron M 585 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 11449 votes

Rate Core i5-12400F on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron M 585 or Core i5-12400F, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.