Mobile Sempron SI-40 vs Celeron M 575

VS

Primary details

Comparing Celeron M 575 and Mobile Sempron SI-40 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel Celeron MAMD Mobile Sempron
Architecture codenameMerom (2006−2008)Sable (2008−2009)
Release date1 June 2008 (16 years ago)4 July 2008 (16 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$86no data

Detailed specifications

Celeron M 575 and Mobile Sempron SI-40 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads11
Boost clock speed2 GHz2 GHz
Bus rate667 MHz1800 MHz
L2 cache1 MB512 KB
Chip lithography65 nm65 nm
Die size143 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature100 °C100 °C
Number of transistors291 Millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Celeron M 575 and Mobile Sempron SI-40 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

SocketPPGA478S1g2
Power consumption (TDP)31 Watt25 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron M 575 and Mobile Sempron SI-40. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno data65 nm, 1.075 - 1.125V

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.



3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

Celeron M 575 898
+16.3%
Mobile Sempron SI-40 772

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 June 2008 4 July 2008
Power consumption (TDP) 31 Watt 25 Watt

Mobile Sempron SI-40 has an age advantage of 1 month, and 24% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Celeron M 575 and Mobile Sempron SI-40. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron M 575 and Mobile Sempron SI-40, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron M 575
Celeron M 575
AMD Mobile Sempron SI-40
Mobile Sempron SI-40

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 9 votes

Rate Celeron M 575 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 35 votes

Rate Mobile Sempron SI-40 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron M 575 or Mobile Sempron SI-40, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.