Atom N475 vs Celeron M 570
Primary details
Comparing Celeron M 570 and Atom N475 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | not rated | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Series | Intel Celeron M | Intel Atom |
| Architecture codename | Merom (2006−2008) | Pineview (2009−2011) |
| Release date | 30 April 2008 (16 years ago) | 1 June 2010 (14 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | no data | $75 |
Detailed specifications
Celeron M 570 and Atom N475 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 1 (Single-Core) | 1 (Single-Core) |
| Threads | 1 | 2 |
| Base clock speed | no data | 1.83 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 2.26 GHz | 1.83 GHz |
| Bus rate | 533 MHz | 533 MHz |
| L1 cache | no data | 64 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 1 MB | 512K (per core) |
| L3 cache | no data | 0 KB |
| Chip lithography | 65 nm | 45 nm |
| Die size | 143 mm2 | 66 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | no data | 100 °C |
| Number of transistors | 291 Million | 123 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Compatibility
Information on Celeron M 570 and Atom N475 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | no data | 1 |
| Socket | PPGA478 | FCBGA559 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 30 Watt | 6.5 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron M 570 and Atom N475. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | no data | Intel® SSE2, Intel® SSE3, Intel® SSSE3 |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | + |
| Turbo Boost Technology | no data | - |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | no data | + |
| Thermal Monitoring | - | + |
| Demand Based Switching | no data | - |
Security technologies
Celeron M 570 and Atom N475 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | no data | - |
| EDB | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron M 570 and Atom N475 are enumerated here.
| VT-d | no data | - |
| VT-x | no data | - |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron M 570 and Atom N475. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | no data | DDR3 |
| Maximum memory size | no data | 2 GB |
| Max memory channels | no data | 1 |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | no data | Intel GMA 3150 |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 30 April 2008 | 1 June 2010 |
| Threads | 1 | 2 |
| Chip lithography | 65 nm | 45 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 30 Watt | 6 Watt |
Atom N475 has an age advantage of 2 years, 100% more threads, a 44.4% more advanced lithography process, and 400% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Celeron M 570 and Atom N475. We've got no test results to judge.
Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron M 570 and Atom N475, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
