A6-3430MX vs Celeron M 370

VS

Aggregate performance score

Celeron M 370
1 core / 1 thread, 21 Watt
0.15
A6-3430MX
2011
4 cores / 4 threads, 45 Watt
0.91
+507%

A6-3430MX outperforms Celeron M 370 by a whopping 507% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Celeron M 370 and A6-3430MX processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking33172539
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesCeleron MAMD A-Series
Power efficiency0.681.91
Architecture codenameDothan (2004−2005)Llano (2011−2012)
Release dateno data20 December 2011 (13 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Celeron M 370 and A6-3430MX basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads14
Base clock speed1.5 GHz1.7 GHz
Boost clock speed1.5 GHz2.4 GHz
Bus rate400 MHzno data
L1 cacheno data128K (per core)
L2 cacheno data1 MB (per core)
L3 cache1 MB L2 Cache0 KB
Chip lithography90 nm32 nm
Die sizeno data228 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °Cno data
Number of transistorsno data1,178 million
64 bit support-+
Windows 11 compatibility--
VID voltage range1.004V-1.292Vno data

Compatibility

Information on Celeron M 370 and A6-3430MX compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
SocketH-PBGA478,H-PBGA479,PPGA478FS1
Power consumption (TDP)21 Watt45 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron M 370 and A6-3430MX. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno data3DNow!, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSE4a, Radeon HD 6480G
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)-no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Idle States-no data
Demand Based Switching-no data
PAE32 Bitno data
FSB parity-no data

Security technologies

Celeron M 370 and A6-3430MX technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron M 370 and A6-3430MX are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-x-no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron M 370 and A6-3430MX. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR3

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataAMD Radeon HD 6520G (400 MHz)

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.15 0.91
Physical cores 1 4
Threads 1 4
Chip lithography 90 nm 32 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 21 Watt 45 Watt

Celeron M 370 has 114.3% lower power consumption.

A6-3430MX, on the other hand, has a 506.7% higher aggregate performance score, 300% more physical cores and 300% more threads, and a 181.3% more advanced lithography process.

The A6-3430MX is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron M 370 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron M 370 and A6-3430MX, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron M 370
Celeron M 370
AMD A6-3430MX
A6-3430MX

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.6 7 votes

Rate Celeron M 370 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.5 40 votes

Rate A6-3430MX on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron M 370 or A6-3430MX, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.