Atom N435 vs Celeron M 353

VS

Primary details

Comparing Celeron M 353 and Atom N435 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot rated3387
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesCeleron MAtom
Power efficiencyno data1.89
Architecture codenameDothan (2004−2005)Pinetrail (2009−2011)
Release dateno data2 June 2011 (13 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Celeron M 353 and Atom N435 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads12
Boost clock speed0.9 GHz1.33 GHz
Bus rate400 MHz533 MHz
L2 cacheno data512 KB
Chip lithography90 nm45 nm
64 bit support-+
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Celeron M 353 and Atom N435 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Socketno dataFCBGA559
Power consumption (TDP)5 Watt5 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron M 353 and Atom N435. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Hyper-Threading Technologyno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron M 353 and Atom N435. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR2, DDR3

Pros & cons summary


Threads 1 2
Chip lithography 90 nm 45 nm

Atom N435 has 100% more threads, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Celeron M 353 and Atom N435. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron M 353 and Atom N435, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron M 353
Celeron M 353
Intel Atom N435
Atom N435

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 22 votes

Rate Celeron M 353 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 31 vote

Rate Atom N435 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron M 353 or Atom N435, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.