Atom N435 vs Celeron M 353
Primary details
Comparing Celeron M 353 and Atom N435 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
Place in the ranking | not rated | 3387 |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
Series | Celeron M | Atom |
Power efficiency | no data | 1.89 |
Architecture codename | Dothan (2004−2005) | Pinetrail (2009−2011) |
Release date | no data | 2 June 2011 (13 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Celeron M 353 and Atom N435 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
Physical cores | 1 (Single-Core) | 1 (Single-Core) |
Threads | 1 | 2 |
Boost clock speed | 0.9 GHz | 1.33 GHz |
Bus rate | 400 MHz | 533 MHz |
L2 cache | no data | 512 KB |
Chip lithography | 90 nm | 45 nm |
64 bit support | - | + |
Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Compatibility
Information on Celeron M 353 and Atom N435 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
Socket | no data | FCBGA559 |
Power consumption (TDP) | 5 Watt | 5 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron M 353 and Atom N435. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
Hyper-Threading Technology | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron M 353 and Atom N435. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
Supported memory types | no data | DDR2, DDR3 |
Pros & cons summary
Threads | 1 | 2 |
Chip lithography | 90 nm | 45 nm |
Atom N435 has 100% more threads, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.
We couldn't decide between Celeron M 353 and Atom N435. We've got no test results to judge.
Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron M 353 and Atom N435, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.