A6-9220C vs Celeron M 340

VS

Aggregate performance score

Celeron M 340
1 core / 1 thread, 24 Watt
0.14
A6-9220C
2019
2 cores / 2 threads, 6 Watt
0.66
+371%

A6-9220C outperforms Celeron M 340 by a whopping 371% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Celeron M 340 and A6-9220C processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking33302756
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesCeleron MAMD Bristol Ridge
Power efficiency0.6310.40
Architecture codenameBanias (2003)Stoney Ridge (2016−2019)
Release dateno data7 January 2019 (5 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Celeron M 340 and A6-9220C basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads12
Base clock speed1.5 GHz1.8 GHz
Boost clock speed1.5 GHz2.7 GHz
Bus rate400 MHzno data
Multiplierno data18
L1 cacheno data160 KB
L2 cacheno data1 MB (shared)
L3 cache512 KB L2no data
Chip lithography130 nm28 nm
Die sizeno data124.5 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °C90 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data74 °C
Number of transistorsno data1,200 million
64 bit support-+
Windows 11 compatibility--
VID voltage range1.356Vno data

Compatibility

Information on Celeron M 340 and A6-9220C compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
SocketPPGA478FT4
Power consumption (TDP)24.5 Watt6 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron M 340 and A6-9220C. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataVirtualization,
AES-NI-+
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)-no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Idle States-no data
Demand Based Switching-no data
PAE32 Bitno data
FSB parity-no data

Security technologies

Celeron M 340 and A6-9220C technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB-no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron M 340 and A6-9220C are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-x-no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron M 340 and A6-9220C. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR4
Maximum memory bandwidthno data14.936 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataAMD Radeon R5 (Stoney Ridge) ( - 720 MHz)

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron M 340 and A6-9220C.

PCIe versionno data3.0
PCI Express lanesno data8

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.14 0.66
Physical cores 1 2
Threads 1 2
Chip lithography 130 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 24 Watt 6 Watt

A6-9220C has a 371.4% higher aggregate performance score, 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, a 364.3% more advanced lithography process, and 300% lower power consumption.

The A6-9220C is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron M 340 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron M 340 and A6-9220C, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron M 340
Celeron M 340
AMD A6-9220C
A6-9220C

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


1 3 votes

Rate Celeron M 340 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.8 32 votes

Rate A6-9220C on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron M 340 or A6-9220C, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.