Xeon E5-2670 v4 vs Celeron M 333
Primary details
Comparing Celeron M 333 and Xeon E5-2670 v4 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | not rated | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Server |
| Series | Celeron M | Intel Xeon E5 |
| Architecture codename | Banias (2003) | Broadwell (2015−2019) |
| Release date | no data (2024 years ago) | 20 June 2016 (8 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Celeron M 333 and Xeon E5-2670 v4 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 1 (Single-Core) | 14 (Tetradeca-Core) |
| Threads | 1 | 28 |
| Boost clock speed | 0.9 GHz | 3.1 GHz |
| Bus type | no data | QPI |
| Bus rate | 400 MHz | 2 × 9.6 GT/s |
| Multiplier | no data | 31 |
| L2 cache | no data | 3.5 MB |
| L3 cache | no data | 35 MB |
| Chip lithography | 130 nm | 14 nm |
| Die size | no data | 306.18 mm2 |
| Number of transistors | no data | 4700 Million |
| 64 bit support | - | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Compatibility
Information on Celeron M 333 and Xeon E5-2670 v4 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | no data | 2 (Multiprocessor) |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 5 Watt | 120 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron M 333 and Xeon E5-2670 v4. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | - | + |
| AVX | - | + |
| vPro | no data | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | + |
| TSX | - | + |
Security technologies
Celeron M 333 and Xeon E5-2670 v4 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron M 333 and Xeon E5-2670 v4. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Maximum memory size | no data | 1,536 GB |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron M 333 and Xeon E5-2670 v4.
| PCIe version | no data | 3.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | no data | 40 |
Pros & cons summary
| Physical cores | 1 | 14 |
| Threads | 1 | 28 |
| Chip lithography | 130 nm | 14 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 5 Watt | 120 Watt |
Celeron M 333 has 2300% lower power consumption.
Xeon E5-2670 v4, on the other hand, has 1300% more physical cores and 2700% more threads, and a 828.6% more advanced lithography process.
We couldn't decide between Celeron M 333 and Xeon E5-2670 v4. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Celeron M 333 is a notebook processor while Xeon E5-2670 v4 is a server/workstation one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron M 333 and Xeon E5-2670 v4, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
