Xeon E5-2670 v4 vs Opteron 6168

VS

Primary details

Comparing Opteron 6168 and Xeon E5-2670 v4 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentServerServer
Seriesno dataIntel Xeon E5
Architecture codenameMagny-Cours (2010−2011)Broadwell (2015−2019)
Release date29 March 2010 (14 years ago)20 June 2016 (8 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Opteron 6168 and Xeon E5-2670 v4 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores12 (Dodeca-Core)14 (Tetradeca-Core)
Threads1228
Boost clock speed1.9 GHz3.1 GHz
Bus typeno dataQPI
Bus rateno data2 × 9.6 GT/s
Multiplierno data31
L1 cache768 KB (shared)no data
L2 cache6 MB (per core)3.5 MB
L3 cache12 MB35 MB
Chip lithography45 nm14 nm
Die size346 mm2306.18 mm2
Maximum case temperature (TCase)69 °Cno data
Number of transistors1,800 million4700 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Opteron 6168 and Xeon E5-2670 v4 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration22 (Multiprocessor)
SocketG34no data
Power consumption (TDP)115 Watt120 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Opteron 6168 and Xeon E5-2670 v4. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI-+
AVX-+
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
TSX-+

Security technologies

Opteron 6168 and Xeon E5-2670 v4 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Opteron 6168 and Xeon E5-2670 v4. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3no data
Maximum memory sizeno data1,536 GB

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Opteron 6168 and Xeon E5-2670 v4.

PCIe version2.03.0
PCI Express lanesno data40

Pros & cons summary


Recency 29 March 2010 20 June 2016
Physical cores 12 14
Threads 12 28
Chip lithography 45 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 115 Watt 120 Watt

Opteron 6168 has 4.3% lower power consumption.

Xeon E5-2670 v4, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 6 years, 16.7% more physical cores and 133.3% more threads, and a 221.4% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Opteron 6168 and Xeon E5-2670 v4. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between Opteron 6168 and Xeon E5-2670 v4, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Opteron 6168
Opteron 6168
Intel Xeon E5-2670 v4
Xeon E5-2670 v4

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 11 votes

Rate Opteron 6168 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 125 votes

Rate Xeon E5-2670 v4 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Opteron 6168 or Xeon E5-2670 v4, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.