Pentium J3710 vs Celeron J4025
Aggregate performance score
Celeron J4025 outperforms Pentium J3710 by a minimal 1% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing Celeron J4025 and Pentium J3710 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in performance ranking | 2406 | 2412 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 0.62 | 0.33 |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Desktop processor |
| Series | no data | Intel Pentium |
| Architecture codename | Gemini Lake Refresh (2019) | Airmont (2015−2016) |
| Release date | 4 November 2019 (4 years ago) | 10 January 2016 (8 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | no data | $161 |
| Current price | $587 | $40 (0.2x MSRP) |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Celeron J4025 has 88% better value for money than Pentium J3710.
Detailed specifications
Celeron J4025 and Pentium J3710 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 4 (Quad-Core) |
| Threads | 2 | 4 |
| Base clock speed | 2 GHz | 1.6 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 2.9 GHz | 2.64 GHz |
| L2 cache | 4 MB | 2 MB |
| L3 cache | 4 MB | 0 KB |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | 14 nm |
| Maximum core temperature | 105 °C | 90 °C |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | + | - |
| Unlocked multiplier | No | No |
Compatibility
Information on Celeron J4025 and Pentium J3710 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Socket | FCBGA1090 | FCBGA1170 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 10 Watt | 6.5 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron J4025 and Pentium J3710. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | Intel® SSE4.2 | no data |
| AES-NI | + | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | + |
| Speed Shift | - | no data |
| Turbo Boost Technology | - | - |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | - | - |
| Idle States | + | no data |
| Thermal Monitoring | + | + |
| SIPP | no data | - |
| Smart Response | - | - |
| GPIO | + | + |
| Smart Connect | no data | - |
| Turbo Boost Max 3.0 | - | no data |
| Status | Discontinued | Discontinued |
| HD Audio | no data | + |
| RST | no data | - |
Security technologies
Celeron J4025 and Pentium J3710 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | no data | - |
| EDB | + | + |
| Secure Boot | no data | + |
| Secure Key | + | + |
| MPX | + | no data |
| Identity Protection | + | + |
| SGX | Yes with Intel® ME | no data |
| OS Guard | + | - |
| Anti-Theft | - | - |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron J4025 and Pentium J3710 are enumerated here.
| VT-d | + | - |
| VT-x | + | + |
| VT-i | no data | - |
| EPT | + | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron J4025 and Pentium J3710. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR4 | DDR3L-1600 |
| Maximum memory size | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Max memory channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC memory support | - | - |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | Intel UHD Graphics 600 | no data |
| Max video memory | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Quick Sync Video | + | + |
| Clear Video | no data | + |
| Clear Video HD | no data | + |
| Graphics max frequency | 700 MHz | 740 MHz |
| Execution Units | 12 | 18 |
Graphics interfaces
Available interfaces and connections of Celeron J4025 and Pentium J3710 integrated GPUs.
| Number of displays supported | 3 | 3 |
| eDP | + | + |
| DisplayPort | + | + |
| HDMI | + | + |
| MIPI-DSI | + | no data |
Graphics image quality
Maximum display resolutions supported by Celeron J4025 and Pentium J3710 integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.
| 4K resolution support | + | no data |
| Max resolution over HDMI 1.4 | 4096x2160@30Hz | no data |
| Max resolution over eDP | 4096x2160@60Hz | no data |
| Max resolution over DisplayPort | 4096x2160@60Hz | no data |
Graphics API support
APIs supported by Celeron J4025 and Pentium J3710 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.
| DirectX | 12 | + |
| OpenGL | 4.4 | + |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron J4025 and Pentium J3710.
| PCIe version | 2.0 | 2.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | 6 | 4 |
| USB revision | 2.0/3.0 | 2.0/3.0 |
| Total number of SATA ports | 2 | 5 |
| Max number of SATA 6 Gb/s Ports | 2 | 2 |
| Number of USB ports | 8 | 5 |
| Integrated LAN | - | - |
| UART | + | + |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
Celeron J4025 outperforms Pentium J3710 by 1% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.
Benchmark coverage: 68%
Celeron J4025 outperforms Pentium J3710 by 1% in Passmark.
GeekBench 5 Single-Core
GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.
Benchmark coverage: 42%
Celeron J4025 outperforms Pentium J3710 by 73% in GeekBench 5 Single-Core.
GeekBench 5 Multi-Core
GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.
Benchmark coverage: 42%
Pentium J3710 outperforms Celeron J4025 by 3% in GeekBench 5 Multi-Core.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 0.95 | 0.94 |
| Recency | 4 November 2019 | 10 January 2016 |
| Physical cores | 2 | 4 |
| Threads | 2 | 4 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 10 Watt | 6 Watt |
Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Celeron J4025 and Pentium J3710.
Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron J4025 and Pentium J3710, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
