N200 vs Celeron J4025

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Celeron J4025
2019
2 cores / 2 threads, 10 Watt
0.93

N200 outperforms Celeron J4025 by a whopping 244% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Celeron J4025 and N200 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking25261613
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation2.67no data
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
Power efficiency8.8050.44
Architecture codenameGemini Lake Refresh (2019)no data
Release date4 November 2019 (5 years ago)1 January 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$107no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Celeron J4025 and N200 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)no data
Threads24
Base clock speed2 GHzno data
Boost clock speed2.9 GHzno data
L1 cache56 KB (per core)no data
L2 cache4 MB (shared)no data
Chip lithography14 nmno data
Die size93 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature105 °Cno data
64 bit support+-
Windows 11 compatibility+no data

Compatibility

Information on Celeron J4025 and N200 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1no data
SocketIntel BGA 1090no data
Power consumption (TDP)10 Watt6 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron J4025 and N200. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron J4025 and N200 are enumerated here.

VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron J4025 and N200. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel UHD Graphics 600 (250 - 700 MHz)no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron J4025 and N200.

PCIe version2.0no data
PCI Express lanes6no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Celeron J4025 0.93
N200 3.20
+244%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Celeron J4025 1477
N200 5083
+244%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.93 3.20
Recency 4 November 2019 1 January 2023
Threads 2 4
Power consumption (TDP) 10 Watt 6 Watt

N200 has a 244.1% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 3 years, 100% more threads, and 66.7% lower power consumption.

The N200 is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron J4025 in performance tests.

Note that Celeron J4025 is a desktop processor while N200 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron J4025 and N200, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron J4025
Celeron J4025
Intel N200
N200

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 129 votes

Rate Celeron J4025 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 39 votes

Rate N200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron J4025 or N200, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.