i3-530 vs Celeron J4025

VS

Aggregate performance score

Celeron J4025
2019
2 cores / 2 threads, 10 Watt
0.93
Core i3-530
2010
2 cores / 4 threads, 73 Watt
0.95
+2.2%

Core i3-530 outperforms Celeron J4025 by a minimal 2% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Celeron J4025 and Core i3-530 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking25262520
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation2.670.14
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
Power efficiency8.801.23
Architecture codenameGemini Lake Refresh (2019)Clarkdale (2010−2011)
Release date4 November 2019 (5 years ago)7 January 2010 (14 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$107$60

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Celeron J4025 has 1807% better value for money than i3-530.

Detailed specifications

Celeron J4025 and Core i3-530 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads24
Base clock speed2 GHz2.93 GHz
Boost clock speed2.9 GHz0.93 GHz
Bus rateno data2.5 GT/s
L1 cache56 KB (per core)64 KB (per core)
L2 cache4 MB (shared)256 KB (per core)
L3 cacheno data4 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm32 nm
Die size93 mm281 mm2
Maximum core temperature105 °C73 °C
Number of transistorsno data382 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+-
VID voltage rangeno data0.65V-1.4V

Compatibility

Information on Celeron J4025 and Core i3-530 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketIntel BGA 1090FCLGA1156
Power consumption (TDP)10 Watt73 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron J4025 and Core i3-530. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® SSE4.2
AES-NI+-
vProno data-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technologyno data-
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data+
Idle Statesno data+
Demand Based Switchingno data-
PAEno data36 Bit
FDIno data+

Security technologies

Celeron J4025 and Core i3-530 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data-
EDBno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron J4025 and Core i3-530 are enumerated here.

VT-d+no data
VT-x++
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron J4025 and Core i3-530. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4DDR3
Maximum memory sizeno data16.38 GB
Max memory channelsno data2
Maximum memory bandwidthno data21 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
Intel UHD Graphics 600 (250 - 700 MHz)Intel HD Graphics for Previous Generation Intel Processors
Clear Video HDno data+

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Celeron J4025 and Core i3-530 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supportedno data2

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron J4025 and Core i3-530.

PCIe version2.02.0
PCI Express lanes616

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Celeron J4025 0.93
i3-530 0.95
+2.2%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Celeron J4025 1477
i3-530 1502
+1.7%

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Celeron J4025 329
i3-530 362
+10%

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Celeron J4025 539
i3-530 750
+39.1%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.93 0.95
Integrated graphics card 0.87 0.77
Recency 4 November 2019 7 January 2010
Threads 2 4
Chip lithography 14 nm 32 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 10 Watt 73 Watt

Celeron J4025 has 13% faster integrated GPU, an age advantage of 9 years, a 128.6% more advanced lithography process, and 630% lower power consumption.

i3-530, on the other hand, has a 2.2% higher aggregate performance score, and 100% more threads.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Celeron J4025 and Core i3-530.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron J4025 and Core i3-530, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron J4025
Celeron J4025
Intel Core i3-530
Core i3-530

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 129 votes

Rate Celeron J4025 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.8 448 votes

Rate Core i3-530 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron J4025 or Core i3-530, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.