9 270H vs Celeron J4025
Primary details
Comparing Celeron J4025 and Core 9 270H processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 2526 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 2.66 | no data |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Laptop |
| Power efficiency | 8.80 | no data |
| Architecture codename | Gemini Lake Refresh (2019) | Raptor Lake-H (2023−2024) |
| Release date | 4 November 2019 (5 years ago) | 18 December 2024 (recently) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $107 | $697 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Detailed specifications
Celeron J4025 and Core 9 270H basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 14 (Tetradeca-Core) |
| Threads | 2 | 20 |
| Base clock speed | 2 GHz | 2.7 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 2.9 GHz | 5.8 GHz |
| L1 cache | 56 KB (per core) | 80 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 4 MB (shared) | 2 MB (per core) |
| L3 cache | no data | 24 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | 10 nm |
| Die size | 93 mm2 | no data |
| Maximum core temperature | 105 °C | no data |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | no data | 72 °C |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | + | no data |
Compatibility
Information on Celeron J4025 and Core 9 270H compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Socket | Intel BGA 1090 | Intel BGA 1744 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 10 Watt | 45 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron J4025 and Core 9 270H. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | + | + |
| AVX | - | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | + |
| TSX | - | + |
Security technologies
Celeron J4025 and Core 9 270H technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron J4025 and Core 9 270H are enumerated here.
| VT-d | + | + |
| VT-x | + | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron J4025 and Core 9 270H. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR4 | DDR4, DDR5 |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card Compare | Intel UHD Graphics 600 (250 - 700 MHz) | Intel Iris Xe Graphics 96EU |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron J4025 and Core 9 270H.
| PCIe version | 2.0 | 5.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | 6 | 8 |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 4 November 2019 | 18 December 2024 |
| Physical cores | 2 | 14 |
| Threads | 2 | 20 |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | 10 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 10 Watt | 45 Watt |
Celeron J4025 has 350% lower power consumption.
9 270H, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 5 years, 600% more physical cores and 900% more threads, and a 40% more advanced lithography process.
We couldn't decide between Celeron J4025 and Core 9 270H. We've got no test results to judge.
Note that Celeron J4025 is a desktop processor while Core 9 270H is a notebook one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron J4025 and Core 9 270H, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
