Celeron G1820 vs J4025

VS

Aggregate performance score

Celeron J4025
2019
2 cores / 2 threads, 10 Watt
0.93
Celeron G1820
2013
2 cores / 2 threads, 53 Watt
1.08
+16.1%

Celeron G1820 outperforms Celeron J4025 by a moderate 16% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Celeron J4025 and Celeron G1820 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking25112407
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation2.600.12
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
Power efficiency8.801.89
Architecture codenameGemini Lake Refresh (2019)Haswell (2013−2015)
Release date4 November 2019 (5 years ago)1 December 2013 (10 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$107$110

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Celeron J4025 has 2067% better value for money than Celeron G1820.

Detailed specifications

Celeron J4025 and Celeron G1820 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads22
Base clock speed2 GHz2.7 GHz
Boost clock speed2.9 GHz2.7 GHz
Bus rateno data5 GT/s
L1 cache56 KB (per core)64 KB (per core)
L2 cache4 MB (shared)256 KB (per core)
L3 cache4 MB2 MB
Chip lithography14 nm22 nm
Die size93 mm2177 mm2
Maximum core temperature105 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data72 °C
Number of transistorsno data1,400 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+-

Compatibility

Information on Celeron J4025 and Celeron G1820 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCBGA1090FCLGA1150
Power consumption (TDP)10 Watt53 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron J4025 and Celeron G1820. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.2Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2
AES-NI+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shift-no data
Turbo Boost Technology--
Hyper-Threading Technology--
Idle States++
Thermal Monitoring++
Smart Response-no data
GPIO+no data
Turbo Boost Max 3.0-no data

Security technologies

Celeron J4025 and Celeron G1820 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data-
EDB++
Secure Key++
MPX+-
Identity Protection+-
SGXYes with Intel® MEno data
OS Guard+no data
Anti-Theft-no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron J4025 and Celeron G1820 are enumerated here.

VT-d+-
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron J4025 and Celeron G1820. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4DDR3
Maximum memory size8 GB32 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidthno data21.3 GB/s
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
Intel UHD Graphics 600Intel HD Graphics for 4th Generation Intel Processors
Max video memory8 GB1.7 GB
Quick Sync Video++
Graphics max frequency700 MHz1.05 GHz
Execution Units12no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Celeron J4025 and Celeron G1820 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported33
eDP++
DisplayPort++
HDMI++
DVIno data+
VGAno data+
MIPI-DSI+no data

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Celeron J4025 and Celeron G1820 integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

4K resolution support+no data
Max resolution over HDMI 1.44096x2160@30Hz1920x1080@60Hz
Max resolution over eDP4096x2160@60Hz2560x1600@60Hz
Max resolution over DisplayPort4096x2160@60Hz2560x1600@60Hz
Max resolution over VGAno data1920x1200@60Hz

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Celeron J4025 and Celeron G1820 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX1211.1/12
OpenGL4.44.3

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron J4025 and Celeron G1820.

PCIe version2.0Up to 3.0
PCI Express lanes616
USB revision2.0/3.0no data
Total number of SATA ports2no data
Max number of SATA 6 Gb/s Ports2no data
Number of USB ports8no data
Integrated LAN-no data
UART+no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Celeron J4025 0.93
Celeron G1820 1.08
+16.1%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Celeron J4025 1473
Celeron G1820 1717
+16.6%

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Celeron J4025 330
Celeron G1820 488
+47.9%

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Celeron J4025 542
Celeron G1820 830
+53.1%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.93 1.08
Integrated graphics card 0.87 0.77
Recency 4 November 2019 1 December 2013
Chip lithography 14 nm 22 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 10 Watt 53 Watt

Celeron J4025 has 13% faster integrated GPU, an age advantage of 5 years, a 57.1% more advanced lithography process, and 430% lower power consumption.

Celeron G1820, on the other hand, has a 16.1% higher aggregate performance score.

The Celeron G1820 is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron J4025 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron J4025 and Celeron G1820, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron J4025
Celeron J4025
Intel Celeron G1820
Celeron G1820

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 125 votes

Rate Celeron J4025 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 165 votes

Rate Celeron G1820 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron J4025 or Celeron G1820, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.