Celeron J4005 vs J3160

VS

Aggregate performance score

Celeron J3160
2016
4 cores / 4 threads, 6 Watt
0.80
Celeron J4005
2017
2 cores / 2 threads, 10 Watt
0.97
+21.3%

Celeron J4005 outperforms Celeron J3160 by a significant 21% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Celeron J3160 and Celeron J4005 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking26192492
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.071.01
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
SeriesIntel CeleronIntel Celeron
Power efficiency12.629.18
Architecture codenameAirmont (2016)Goldmont Plus (2017)
Release date15 January 2016 (8 years ago)11 December 2017 (7 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$107$107

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Celeron J4005 has 1343% better value for money than Celeron J3160.

Detailed specifications

Celeron J3160 and Celeron J4005 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads42
Base clock speed1.6 GHz2 GHz
Boost clock speed2.24 GHz2.7 GHz
Bus typeIDIno data
Multiplierno data20
L1 cacheno data56 KB (per core)
L2 cache2 MB4 MB (shared)
L3 cache0 KB4 MB
Chip lithography14 nm14 nm
Die sizeno data93 mm2
Maximum core temperature90 °C105 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+

Compatibility

Information on Celeron J3160 and Celeron J4005 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1 (Uniprocessor)
SocketFCBGA1170FCBGA1090
Power consumption (TDP)6 Watt10 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron J3160 and Celeron J4005. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® SSE4.2
AES-NI++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shiftno data-
Turbo Boost Technology--
Hyper-Threading Technology--
Idle Statesno data+
Thermal Monitoring++
Smart Response--
GPIO++
Smart Connect-no data
Turbo Boost Max 3.0no data-
HD Audio+no data
RST-no data

Security technologies

Celeron J3160 and Celeron J4005 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB++
Secure Boot+no data
Secure Key++
MPX-+
Identity Protection++
SGXno dataYes with Intel® ME
OS Guard-+
Anti-Theft--

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron J3160 and Celeron J4005 are enumerated here.

VT-d-+
VT-x++
VT-i-no data
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron J3160 and Celeron J4005. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3L-1600DDR4
Maximum memory size8 GB8 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidthno data38.397 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataIntel UHD Graphics 600
Max video memory8 GB8 GB
Quick Sync Video++
Clear Video+no data
Clear Video HD+no data
Graphics max frequency700 MHz700 MHz
Execution Units1212

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Celeron J3160 and Celeron J4005 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported33
eDP++
DisplayPort++
HDMI++
MIPI-DSIno data+

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Celeron J3160 and Celeron J4005 integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

4K resolution supportno data+

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Celeron J3160 and Celeron J4005 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX+12
OpenGL+4.4

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron J3160 and Celeron J4005.

PCIe version2.02.0
PCI Express lanes46
USB revision2.0/3.02.0/3.0
Total number of SATA ports52
Max number of SATA 6 Gb/s Ports22
Number of USB ports58
Integrated LAN--
UART++

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Celeron J3160 0.80
Celeron J4005 0.97
+21.3%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Celeron J3160 1269
Celeron J4005 1547
+21.9%

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Celeron J3160 172
Celeron J4005 344
+100%

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Celeron J3160 505
Celeron J4005 580
+14.9%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.80 0.97
Recency 15 January 2016 11 December 2017
Physical cores 4 2
Threads 4 2
Power consumption (TDP) 6 Watt 10 Watt

Celeron J3160 has 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, and 66.7% lower power consumption.

Celeron J4005, on the other hand, has a 21.3% higher aggregate performance score, and an age advantage of 1 year.

The Celeron J4005 is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron J3160 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron J3160 and Celeron J4005, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron J3160
Celeron J3160
Intel Celeron J4005
Celeron J4005

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.1 55 votes

Rate Celeron J3160 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.1 166 votes

Rate Celeron J4005 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron J3160 or Celeron J4005, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.