Celeron G6900 vs J1900

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Celeron J1900
2013
4 cores / 4 threads, 10 Watt
0.72
Celeron G6900
2022
2 cores / 2 threads, 46 Watt
2.86
+297%

Celeron G6900 outperforms Celeron J1900 by a whopping 297% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Celeron J1900 and Celeron G6900 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking26981673
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
SeriesIntel Celeronno data
Power efficiency6.815.88
Architecture codenameBay Trail-D (2013)Alder Lake-S (2022)
Release date1 November 2013 (11 years ago)4 January 2022 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$82no data

Detailed specifications

Celeron J1900 and Celeron G6900 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads42
Base clock speed2 GHz3.4 GHz
Boost clock speed2.42 GHz3.4 GHz
L1 cache224 KB80K (per core)
L2 cache2 MB1.25 MB (per core)
L3 cache2 MB L2 Cache4 MB (shared)
Chip lithography22 nmIntel 7 nm
Maximum core temperature105 °C100 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+

Compatibility

Information on Celeron J1900 and Celeron G6900 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCBGA1170FCLGA1700
Power consumption (TDP)10 Watt46 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron J1900 and Celeron G6900. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2
AES-NI-+
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shiftno data+
Turbo Boost Technology--
Hyper-Threading Technology--
TSX-+
Idle Statesno data+
Thermal Monitoring-+
PAE36 Bitno data
Turbo Boost Max 3.0no data-
FDI-no data
RST-no data
Deep Learning Boost-+

Security technologies

Celeron J1900 and Celeron G6900 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+
EDB++
Secure Keyno data+
OS Guardno data+
Anti-Theft-no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron J1900 and Celeron G6900 are enumerated here.

VT-d-+
VT-x++
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron J1900 and Celeron G6900. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200
Maximum memory size8 GB128 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidthno data76.8 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
Intel HD Graphics for Intel Atom Processor Z3700 SeriesIntel UHD Graphics 710
Quick Sync Video++
Clear Video HDno data+
Graphics max frequency854 MHz1.3 GHz
Execution Unitsno data16

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Celeron J1900 and Celeron G6900 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported24

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Celeron J1900 and Celeron G6900 integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

Max resolution over HDMI 1.4no data4096 x 2160 @ 60Hz
Max resolution over eDPno data5120 x 3200 @ 120Hz
Max resolution over DisplayPortno data7680 x 4320 @ 60Hz

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Celeron J1900 and Celeron G6900 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXno data12
OpenGLno data4.5

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron J1900 and Celeron G6900.

PCIe version2.05.0 and 4.0
PCI Express lanes420

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Celeron J1900 0.72
Celeron G6900 2.86
+297%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Celeron J1900 1149
Celeron G6900 4549
+296%

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Celeron J1900 173
Celeron G6900 1683
+873%

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Celeron J1900 517
Celeron G6900 2821
+446%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.72 2.86
Integrated graphics card 0.77 2.86
Recency 1 November 2013 4 January 2022
Physical cores 4 2
Threads 4 2
Power consumption (TDP) 10 Watt 46 Watt

Celeron J1900 has 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, and 360% lower power consumption.

Celeron G6900, on the other hand, has a 297.2% higher aggregate performance score, 271.4% faster integrated GPU, and an age advantage of 8 years.

The Celeron G6900 is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron J1900 in performance tests.

Be aware that Celeron J1900 is a notebook processor while Celeron G6900 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron J1900 and Celeron G6900, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron J1900
Celeron J1900
Intel Celeron G6900
Celeron G6900

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 196 votes

Rate Celeron J1900 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 169 votes

Rate Celeron G6900 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron J1900 or Celeron G6900, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.