Processor N95 vs Celeron J1800

VS

Aggregate performance score

Celeron J1800
2013
2 cores / 2 threads, 10 Watt
0.36
Processor N95
2023
4 cores / 4 threads, 15 Watt
3.18
+783%

Processor N95 outperforms Celeron J1800 by a whopping 783% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Celeron J1800 and Processor N95 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking30511616
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel CeleronIntel Alder Lake-N
Power efficiency3.4120.06
Architecture codenameBay Trail-D (2013)Alder Lake-N (2023)
Release date1 November 2013 (11 years ago)3 January 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$72no data

Detailed specifications

Celeron J1800 and Processor N95 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads24
Base clock speed2.41 GHz0.1 GHz
Boost clock speed2.58 GHz3.4 GHz
L1 cache112 KB96 KB (per core)
L2 cache1 MB2 MB (shared)
L3 cache1 MB L2 Cache6 MB (shared)
Chip lithography22 nm10 nm
Maximum core temperature105 °C105 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+

Compatibility

Information on Celeron J1800 and Processor N95 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCBGA1170Intel BGA 1264
Power consumption (TDP)10 Watt15 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron J1800 and Processor N95. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI-+
FMA-+
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
PAE36 Bitno data
FDI-no data
RST-no data

Security technologies

Celeron J1800 and Processor N95 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+
EDB+no data
Anti-Theft-no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron J1800 and Processor N95 are enumerated here.

VT-d-+
VT-x++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron J1800 and Processor N95. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR4, DDR5
Maximum memory size8 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
Intel HD Graphics for Intel Atom Processor Z3700 SeriesIntel UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) ( - 1200 MHz)
Quick Sync Video+-
Graphics max frequency792 MHzno data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Celeron J1800 and Processor N95 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported2no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron J1800 and Processor N95.

PCIe version2.03.0
PCI Express lanes49

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.36 3.18
Integrated graphics card 0.77 2.30
Recency 1 November 2013 3 January 2023
Physical cores 2 4
Threads 2 4
Chip lithography 22 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 10 Watt 15 Watt

Celeron J1800 has 50% lower power consumption.

Processor N95, on the other hand, has a 783.3% higher aggregate performance score, 198.7% faster integrated GPU, an age advantage of 9 years, 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, and a 120% more advanced lithography process.

The Processor N95 is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron J1800 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron J1800 and Processor N95, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron J1800
Celeron J1800
Intel Processor N95
Processor N95

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.8 539 votes

Rate Celeron J1800 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 717 votes

Rate Processor N95 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron J1800 or Processor N95, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.