Processor N95 vs Celeron J1900

Place in the ranking	2693	1616
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Market segment	Laptop	Laptop
Series	Intel Celeron	Intel Alder Lake-N
Power efficiency	6.87	19.96
Architecture codename	Bay Trail-D (2013)	Alder Lake-N (2023)
Release date	1 November 2013 (11 years ago)	3 January 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$82	no data

Detailed specifications

Celeron J1900 and Processor N95 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores	4 (Quad-Core)	4 (Quad-Core)
Threads	4	4
Base clock speed	2 GHz	0.1 GHz
Boost clock speed	2.42 GHz	3.4 GHz
L1 cache	224 KB	96 KB (per core)
L2 cache	2 MB	2 MB (shared)
L3 cache	2 MB L2 Cache	6 MB (shared)
Chip lithography	22 nm	10 nm
Maximum core temperature	105 °C	105 °C
64 bit support	+	+
Windows 11 compatibility	-	+

Compatibility

Information on Celeron J1900 and Processor N95 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration	1	1
Socket	FCBGA1170	Intel BGA 1264
Power consumption (TDP)	10 Watt	15 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron J1900 and Processor N95. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI	-	+
FMA	-	+
AVX	-	+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)	+	+
Turbo Boost Technology	-	no data
Hyper-Threading Technology	-	no data
PAE	36 Bit	no data
FDI	-	no data
RST	-	no data

Security technologies

Celeron J1900 and Processor N95 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT	no data	+
EDB	+	no data
Anti-Theft	-	no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron J1900 and Processor N95 are enumerated here.

VT-d	-	+
VT-x	+	+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron J1900 and Processor N95. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory types	DDR3	DDR4, DDR5
Maximum memory size	8 GB	no data
Max memory channels	2	no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card Compare	Intel HD Graphics for Intel Atom Processor Z3700 Series	Intel UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) ( - 1200 MHz)
Quick Sync Video	+	-
Graphics max frequency	854 MHz	no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Celeron J1900 and Processor N95 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported

no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron J1900 and Processor N95.

PCIe version	2.0	3.0
PCI Express lanes	4	9

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	0.73	3.18
Integrated graphics card	0.77	2.30
Recency	1 November 2013	3 January 2023
Chip lithography	22 nm	10 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	10 Watt	15 Watt

Celeron J1900 has 50% lower power consumption.

Processor N95, on the other hand, has a 335.6% higher aggregate performance score, 198.7% faster integrated GPU, an age advantage of 9 years, and a 120% more advanced lithography process.

The Processor N95 is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron J1900 in performance tests.

Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron J1900 and Processor N95, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.