Celeron N6211 vs G6900

VS

Aggregate performance score

Celeron G6900
2022
2 cores / 2 threads, 46 Watt
2.88
+103%
Celeron N6211
2022
2 cores / 2 threads, 6 Watt
1.42

Celeron G6900 outperforms Celeron N6211 by a whopping 103% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Celeron G6900 and Celeron N6211 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking16622197
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data3.33
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
Seriesno dataElkhart Lake
Power efficiency5.9020.59
Architecture codenameAlder Lake-S (2022)Elkhart Lake (2022)
Release date4 January 2022 (2 years ago)17 July 2022 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$54

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Celeron G6900 and Celeron N6211 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads22
Base clock speed3.4 GHz1.2 GHz
Boost clock speed3.4 GHz3 GHz
L1 cache80K (per core)no data
L2 cache1.25 MB (per core)1.5 MB
L3 cache4 MB (shared)no data
Chip lithographyIntel 7 nm10 nm
Maximum core temperature100 °C70 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility++

Compatibility

Information on Celeron G6900 and Celeron N6211 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1no data
SocketFCLGA1700BGA1493
Power consumption (TDP)46 Watt6.5 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron G6900 and Celeron N6211. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2no data
AES-NI++
AVX+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shift+no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
TSX+-
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Turbo Boost Max 3.0-no data
Deep Learning Boost+-

Security technologies

Celeron G6900 and Celeron N6211 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data
Secure Key+no data
OS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron G6900 and Celeron N6211 are enumerated here.

VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron G6900 and Celeron N6211. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR5-4800, DDR4-3200DDR4
Maximum memory size128 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth76.8 GB/sno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
Intel UHD Graphics 710Intel UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 16 EU)
Quick Sync Video+-
Clear Video HD+no data
Graphics max frequency1.3 GHzno data
Execution Units16no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Celeron G6900 and Celeron N6211 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported4no data

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Celeron G6900 and Celeron N6211 integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

Max resolution over HDMI 1.44096 x 2160 @ 60Hzno data
Max resolution over eDP5120 x 3200 @ 120Hzno data
Max resolution over DisplayPort7680 x 4320 @ 60Hzno data

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Celeron G6900 and Celeron N6211 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX12no data
OpenGL4.5no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron G6900 and Celeron N6211.

PCIe version5.0 and 4.0no data
PCI Express lanes20no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Celeron G6900 2.88
+103%
Celeron N6211 1.42

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Celeron G6900 4551
+103%
Celeron N6211 2245

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 2.88 1.42
Integrated graphics card 2.85 1.39
Recency 4 January 2022 17 July 2022
Power consumption (TDP) 46 Watt 6 Watt

Celeron G6900 has a 102.8% higher aggregate performance score, and 105% faster integrated GPU.

Celeron N6211, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 6 months, and 666.7% lower power consumption.

The Celeron G6900 is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron N6211 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron G6900 and Celeron N6211, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron G6900
Celeron G6900
Intel Celeron N6211
Celeron N6211

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 163 votes

Rate Celeron G6900 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.3 4 votes

Rate Celeron N6211 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron G6900 or Celeron N6211, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.