Xeon w7-2565X vs Celeron G555

Primary details

Comparing Celeron G555 and Xeon w7-2565X processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking	2550	not rated
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	0.05	no data
Market segment	Desktop processor	Server
Power efficiency	1.27	no data
Architecture codename	Sandy Bridge (2011−2013)	Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024)
Release date	1 September 2012 (12 years ago)	24 August 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$89	$1,339

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Detailed specifications

Celeron G555 and Xeon w7-2565X basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores	2 (Dual-core)	18 (Octadeca-Core)
Threads	2	36
Base clock speed	2.7 GHz	3.2 GHz
Boost clock speed	2.7 GHz	4.8 GHz
Bus rate	5 GT/s	no data
L1 cache	64 KB (per core)	80 KB (per core)
L2 cache	256 KB (per core)	2 MB (per core)
L3 cache	2 MB (shared)	37.5 MB
Chip lithography	32 nm	10 nm
Die size	131 mm2	no data
Maximum core temperature	69 °C	no data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)	no data	79 °C
Number of transistors	504 million	no data
64 bit support	+	+
Windows 11 compatibility	-	no data
Unlocked multiplier	-	+

Compatibility

Information on Celeron G555 and Xeon w7-2565X compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration	1	1
Socket	FCLGA1155	4677
Power consumption (TDP)	65 Watt	240 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron G555 and Xeon w7-2565X. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensions	Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2	no data
AES-NI	-	+
AVX	-	+
vPro	no data	+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)	+	+
Turbo Boost Technology	-	no data
Hyper-Threading Technology	-	no data
TSX	-	+
Idle States	+	no data
Thermal Monitoring	+	-
Flex Memory Access	+	no data
FDI	+	no data
Fast Memory Access	+	no data

Security technologies

Celeron G555 and Xeon w7-2565X technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT	-	+
EDB	+	no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron G555 and Xeon w7-2565X are enumerated here.

VT-d	-	+
VT-x	+	+
EPT	+	no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron G555 and Xeon w7-2565X. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory types	DDR3	DDR5
Maximum memory size	32 GB	no data
Max memory channels	2	no data
Maximum memory bandwidth	17 GB/s	no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card	Intel® HD Graphics for 2nd Generation Intel® Processors	N/A
Graphics max frequency	1 GHz	no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Celeron G555 and Xeon w7-2565X integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported

2

no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron G555 and Xeon w7-2565X.

PCIe version	2.0	5.0
PCI Express lanes	no data	64

Pros & cons summary

---

Recency	1 September 2012	24 August 2024
Physical cores	2	18
Threads	2	36
Chip lithography	32 nm	10 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	65 Watt	240 Watt

---

Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron G555 and Xeon w7-2565X, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.

---