Celeron G465 vs G555

VS

Aggregate performance score

Celeron G555
2012
2 cores / 2 threads, 65 Watt
0.87
+156%
Celeron G465
2012
1 core / 2 threads, 35 Watt
0.34

Celeron G555 outperforms Celeron G465 by a whopping 156% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Celeron G555 and Celeron G465 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking25513058
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.05no data
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
Power efficiency1.270.92
Architecture codenameSandy Bridge (2011−2013)Sandy Bridge (2011−2013)
Release date1 September 2012 (12 years ago)1 September 2012 (12 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$89$80

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Celeron G555 and Celeron G465 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads22
Base clock speed2.7 GHz1.9 GHz
Boost clock speed2.7 GHz1.9 GHz
Bus rate5 GT/s5 GT/s
L1 cache64 KB (per core)64 KB
L2 cache256 KB (per core)256 KB
L3 cache2 MB (shared)1.5 MB
Chip lithography32 nm32 nm
Die size131 mm2131 mm2
Maximum core temperature69 °C66 °C
Number of transistors504 million504 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Celeron G555 and Celeron G465 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCLGA1155FCLGA1155
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron G555 and Celeron G465. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology--
Hyper-Threading Technology-+
Idle States++
Thermal Monitoring++
Flex Memory Access++
FDI++
Fast Memory Access++

Security technologies

Celeron G555 and Celeron G465 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT--
EDB++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron G555 and Celeron G465 are enumerated here.

VT-d--
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron G555 and Celeron G465. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR3
Maximum memory size32 GB32 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidth17 GB/s17 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel HD Graphics for 2nd Generation Intel ProcessorsIntel HD Graphics for 2nd Generation Intel Processors
Clear Video HD--
Graphics max frequency1 GHz1 GHz
InTru 3D--

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Celeron G555 and Celeron G465 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported22

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron G555 and Celeron G465.

PCIe version2.02.0

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Celeron G555 0.87
+156%
Celeron G465 0.34

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Celeron G555 1388
+154%
Celeron G465 547

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.87 0.34
Physical cores 2 1
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 35 Watt

Celeron G555 has a 155.9% higher aggregate performance score, and 100% more physical cores.

Celeron G465, on the other hand, has 85.7% lower power consumption.

The Celeron G555 is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron G465 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron G555 and Celeron G465, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron G555
Celeron G555
Intel Celeron G465
Celeron G465

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.6 10 votes

Rate Celeron G555 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
1.7 6 votes

Rate Celeron G465 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron G555 or Celeron G465, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.