Athlon 220GE vs Celeron G4900

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Celeron G4900
2018
2 cores / 2 threads, 51 Watt
1.49
Athlon 220GE
2018
2 cores / 4 threads, 35 Watt
2.77
+85.9%

Athlon 220GE outperforms Celeron G4900 by an impressive 86% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Celeron G4900 and Athlon 220GE processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking21561690
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation2.954.08
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
SeriesIntel CeleronAMD Athlon
Power efficiency2.787.53
Architecture codenameCoffee Lake (2017−2019)Zen (2017−2020)
Release date3 April 2018 (6 years ago)1 June 2018 (6 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$42$65

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Athlon 220GE has 38% better value for money than Celeron G4900.

Detailed specifications

Celeron G4900 and Athlon 220GE basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads24
Base clock speed3.1 GHz3.4 GHz
Boost clock speed3.1 GHz3.4 GHz
Bus typeDMI 3.0no data
Bus rate4 × 8 GT/sno data
Multiplier3134
L1 cache64K (per core)96K (per core)
L2 cache256K (per core)512K (per core)
L3 cache6 MB (shared)4 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm14 nm
Die size126 mm2209.78 mm2
Maximum case temperature (TCase)72 °Cno data
Number of transistorsno data4,800 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+-

Compatibility

Information on Celeron G4900 and Athlon 220GE compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1 (Uniprocessor)
Socket1151AM4
Power consumption (TDP)51 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron G4900 and Athlon 220GE. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
FMA-+
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Precision Boost 2no data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron G4900 and Athlon 220GE are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron G4900 and Athlon 220GE. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4 Dual-channelDDR4 Dual-channel
Maximum memory size64 GB64 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidth38.397 GB/s42.671 GB/s
ECC memory support++

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
Intel UHD Graphics 610AMD Radeon Vega 3

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron G4900 and Athlon 220GE.

PCIe version3.03.0
PCI Express lanesno data12

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Celeron G4900 1.49
Athlon 220GE 2.77
+85.9%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Celeron G4900 2385
Athlon 220GE 4432
+85.8%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.49 2.77
Integrated graphics card 1.89 2.99
Recency 3 April 2018 1 June 2018
Threads 2 4
Power consumption (TDP) 51 Watt 35 Watt

Athlon 220GE has a 85.9% higher aggregate performance score, 58.2% faster integrated GPU, an age advantage of 1 month, 100% more threads, and 45.7% lower power consumption.

The Athlon 220GE is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron G4900 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron G4900 and Athlon 220GE, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron G4900
Celeron G4900
AMD Athlon 220GE
Athlon 220GE

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 118 votes

Rate Celeron G4900 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 49 votes

Rate Athlon 220GE on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron G4900 or Athlon 220GE, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.