Celeron G4900 vs Ryzen Threadripper 1900X

Aggregate performance score

Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
2017
8 cores / 16 threads, 180 Watt
10.62
+603%
Celeron G4900
2018
2 cores / 2 threads, 54 Watt
1.51

Ryzen Threadripper 1900X outperforms Celeron G4900 by a whopping 603% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Ryzen Threadripper 1900X and Celeron G4900 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking7302138
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation3.742.95
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
SeriesAMD Ryzen ThreadripperIntel Celeron
Power efficiency5.562.64
Architecture codenameZen (2017−2020)Coffee Lake (2017−2019)
Release date30 July 2017 (7 years ago)2 April 2018 (6 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$549$42

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Ryzen Threadripper 1900X has 27% better value for money than Celeron G4900.

Detailed specifications

Ryzen Threadripper 1900X and Celeron G4900 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores8 (Octa-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads162
Base clock speed3.8 GHz3.1 GHz
Boost clock speed3.8 GHz3.1 GHz
Bus typeno dataDMI 3.0
Bus rate4 × 8 GT/s4 × 8 GT/s
Multiplier3831
L1 cache768 KB128 KB
L2 cache4 MB512 KB
L3 cache16 MB2 MB
Chip lithography14 nm14 nm
Die size213 mm2126 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data100 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data72 °C
Number of transistors9600 Millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+
Unlocked multiplier+-

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen Threadripper 1900X and Celeron G4900 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1 (Uniprocessor)
SocketSP3r2FCLGA1151
Power consumption (TDP)180 Watt54 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen Threadripper 1900X and Celeron G4900. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2
AES-NI++
AVX+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data-
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data-
Idle Statesno data+
Thermal Monitoring-+

Security technologies

Ryzen Threadripper 1900X and Celeron G4900 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data-
EDBno data+
Secure Keyno data+
MPX-+
Identity Protection-+
SGXno dataYes with Intel® ME
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen Threadripper 1900X and Celeron G4900 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen Threadripper 1900X and Celeron G4900. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4 Quad-channelDDR4-2400
Maximum memory size2 TiB64 GB
Max memory channels42
Maximum memory bandwidth85.33 GB/s38.397 GB/s
ECC memory support++

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card-Intel UHD Graphics 610
Max video memory-64 GB
Quick Sync Video-+
Clear Video-+
Clear Video HD-+
Graphics max frequency-1.05 GHz
InTru 3D-+

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Ryzen Threadripper 1900X and Celeron G4900 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported-3

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Ryzen Threadripper 1900X and Celeron G4900 integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

4K resolution support-+
Max resolution over HDMI 1.4-4096x2304@24Hz
Max resolution over eDP-4096x2304@60Hz
Max resolution over DisplayPort-4096x2304@60Hz

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Ryzen Threadripper 1900X and Celeron G4900 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX-12
OpenGL-4.5

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen Threadripper 1900X and Celeron G4900.

PCIe version3.03.0
PCI Express lanes6016

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Ryzen Threadripper 1900X 10.62
+603%
Celeron G4900 1.51

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Ryzen Threadripper 1900X 16809
+602%
Celeron G4900 2394

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Ryzen Threadripper 1900X 1187
+96.2%
Celeron G4900 605

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Ryzen Threadripper 1900X 5885
+471%
Celeron G4900 1031

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 10.62 1.51
Recency 30 July 2017 2 April 2018
Physical cores 8 2
Threads 16 2
Power consumption (TDP) 180 Watt 54 Watt

Ryzen Threadripper 1900X has a 603.3% higher aggregate performance score, and 300% more physical cores and 700% more threads.

Celeron G4900, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 8 months, and 233.3% lower power consumption.

The Ryzen Threadripper 1900X is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron G4900 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen Threadripper 1900X and Celeron G4900, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
Intel Celeron G4900
Celeron G4900

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 125 votes

Rate Ryzen Threadripper 1900X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 115 votes

Rate Celeron G4900 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Ryzen Threadripper 1900X or Celeron G4900, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.