Xeon w7-2575X vs Celeron G465

Primary details

Comparing Celeron G465 and Xeon w7-2575X processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot rated75
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data69.67
Market segmentDesktop processorServer
Power efficiencyno data14.63
Architecture codenameSandy Bridge (2011−2013)Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024)
Release date1 September 2012 (12 years ago)24 August 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$80$1,689

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Celeron G465 and Xeon w7-2575X basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)22 (Docosa-Core)
Threads244
Base clock speed1.9 GHz3 GHz
Boost clock speed1.9 GHz4.8 GHz
Bus rate5 GT/sno data
L1 cache64 KB80 KB (per core)
L2 cache256 KB2 MB (per core)
L3 cache1.5 MB45 MB
Chip lithography32 nmIntel 7 nm
Die size131 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature66 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data76 °C
Number of transistors504 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data
Unlocked multiplier-+

Compatibility

Information on Celeron G465 and Xeon w7-2575X compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCLGA1155FCLGA4677
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt250 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron G465 and Xeon w7-2575X. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® AMX, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512
AES-NI-+
AVX-+
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shiftno data+
Turbo Boost Technology-2.0
Hyper-Threading Technology++
TSX-+
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Flex Memory Access+no data
Turbo Boost Max 3.0no data+
FDI+no data
Fast Memory Access+no data
Deep Learning Boost-+

Security technologies

Celeron G465 and Xeon w7-2575X technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-+
EDB++
SGXno data-
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron G465 and Xeon w7-2575X are enumerated here.

VT-d-+
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron G465 and Xeon w7-2575X. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR5-4800
Maximum memory size32 GB2 TB
Max memory channels24
Maximum memory bandwidth17 GB/sno data
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel® HD Graphics for 2nd Generation Intel® ProcessorsN/A
Graphics max frequency1 GHzno data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Celeron G465 and Xeon w7-2575X integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported2no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron G465 and Xeon w7-2575X.

PCIe version2.05.0
PCI Express lanesno data64

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.



Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Celeron G465 547
Xeon w7-2575X 61402
+11125%

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 September 2012 24 August 2024
Physical cores 1 22
Threads 2 44
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 250 Watt

Celeron G465 has 614.3% lower power consumption.

Xeon w7-2575X, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 11 years, and 2100% more physical cores and 2100% more threads.

We couldn't decide between Celeron G465 and Xeon w7-2575X. We've got no test results to judge.

Note that Celeron G465 is a desktop processor while Xeon w7-2575X is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron G465 and Xeon w7-2575X, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron G465
Celeron G465
Intel Xeon w7-2575X
Xeon w7-2575X

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


1.7 6 votes

Rate Celeron G465 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Xeon w7-2575X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron G465 or Xeon w7-2575X, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.