Xeon W-1350 vs Celeron G3900E

Primary details

Comparing Celeron G3900E and Xeon W-1350 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking	2291	649
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	0.18	93.51
Market segment	Laptop	Server
Series	Intel Celeron	no data
Power efficiency	3.46	14.16
Architecture codename	Skylake (2015−2016)	Rocket Lake-S (2021)
Release date	2 January 2016 (8 years ago)	6 May 2021 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$107	$255

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Xeon W-1350 has 51850% better value for money than Celeron G3900E.

Detailed specifications

Celeron G3900E and Xeon W-1350 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores	2 (Dual-core)	6 (Hexa-Core)
Threads	2	12
Base clock speed	no data	3.3 GHz
Boost clock speed	2.4 GHz	5 GHz
Bus type	DMI 3.0	no data
Bus rate	4 × 8 GT/s	8 GT/s
Multiplier	24	no data
L1 cache	128 KB	80 KB (per core)
L2 cache	512 KB	512 KB (per core)
L3 cache	2 MB	12 MB (shared)
Chip lithography	14 nm	14 nm
Die size	98.57 mm2	276 mm2
Maximum core temperature	no data	100 °C
Number of transistors	1750 Million	no data
64 bit support	+	+
Windows 11 compatibility	-	+

Compatibility

Information on Celeron G3900E and Xeon W-1350 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration	1 (Uniprocessor)	1
Socket	no data	FCLGA1200
Power consumption (TDP)	35 Watt	80 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron G3900E and Xeon W-1350. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensions	no data	Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512
AES-NI	+	+
AVX	-	+
vPro	no data	+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)	+	+
Turbo Boost Technology	no data	2.0
Hyper-Threading Technology	no data	+
TSX	-	+
Idle States	no data	+
Thermal Monitoring	-	+
Turbo Boost Max 3.0	no data	-
Deep Learning Boost	-	+

Security technologies

Celeron G3900E and Xeon W-1350 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT	no data	+
EDB	no data	+
Secure Key	no data	+
Identity Protection	-	+
SGX	no data	-
OS Guard	no data	+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron G3900E and Xeon W-1350 are enumerated here.

VT-d	+	+
VT-x	+	+
EPT	no data	+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron G3900E and Xeon W-1350. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory types	LPDDR3-1866	DDR4-3200
Maximum memory size	64 GB	128 GB
Max memory channels	2	2
Maximum memory bandwidth	34.134 GB/s	50 GB/s
ECC memory support	+	+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card Compare	Intel HD Graphics 510	Intel UHD Graphics P750
Max video memory	no data	64 GB
Quick Sync Video	-	+
Clear Video	no data	+
Clear Video HD	no data	+
Graphics max frequency	no data	1.3 GHz
Execution Units	no data	32
InTru 3D	no data	+

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Celeron G3900E and Xeon W-1350 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported

no data

3

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Celeron G3900E and Xeon W-1350 integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

4K resolution support	no data	+
Max resolution over HDMI 1.4	no data	4096x2160@60Hz
Max resolution over eDP	no data	5120 x 3200 @60Hz
Max resolution over DisplayPort	no data	5120 x 3200 @60Hz

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Celeron G3900E and Xeon W-1350 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX	no data	12.1
OpenGL	no data	4.5

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron G3900E and Xeon W-1350.

PCIe version	3.0	4.0
PCI Express lanes	16	20

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.

---

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

---

Pros & cons summary

---

Performance score	1.28	11.97
Integrated graphics card	1.61	4.56
Recency	2 January 2016	6 May 2021
Physical cores	2	6
Threads	2	12
Power consumption (TDP)	35 Watt	80 Watt

---

Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron G3900E and Xeon W-1350, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.

---