EPYC 9655 vs Celeron E3300

VS

Primary details

Comparing Celeron E3300 and EPYC 9655 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2888not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.83no data
Market segmentDesktop processorServer
Power efficiency0.72no data
Architecture codenameWolfdale (2008−2010)Turin (2024)
Release date30 August 2009 (15 years ago)10 October 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$70$11,852

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Celeron E3300 and EPYC 9655 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)96
Threads2192
Base clock speed2.5 GHz2.6 GHz
Boost clock speed2.5 GHz4.5 GHz
L1 cache64 KB (per core)80 KB (per core)
L2 cache1 MB (shared)1 MB (per core)
L3 cache0 KB384 MB (shared)
Chip lithography45 nm4 nm
Die size82 mm212x 70.6 mm2
Maximum core temperature74 °Cno data
Number of transistors228 million99,780 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data
VID voltage range0.85V-1.3625Vno data

Compatibility

Information on Celeron E3300 and EPYC 9655 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration12
SocketLGA775SP5
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt400 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron E3300 and EPYC 9655. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI-+
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Precision Boost 2no data+

Security technologies

Celeron E3300 and EPYC 9655 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron E3300 and EPYC 9655 are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d-no data
VT-x+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron E3300 and EPYC 9655. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR1, DDR2, DDR3DDR5

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardOn certain motherboards (Chipset feature)N/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron E3300 and EPYC 9655.

PCIe version2.05.0
PCI Express lanesno data128

Pros & cons summary


Recency 30 August 2009 10 October 2024
Physical cores 2 96
Threads 2 192
Chip lithography 45 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 400 Watt

Celeron E3300 has 515.4% lower power consumption.

EPYC 9655, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 15 years, 4700% more physical cores and 9500% more threads, and a 1025% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Celeron E3300 and EPYC 9655. We've got no test results to judge.

Note that Celeron E3300 is a desktop processor while EPYC 9655 is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron E3300 and EPYC 9655, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron E3300
Celeron E3300
AMD EPYC 9655
EPYC 9655

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 178 votes

Rate Celeron E3300 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.1 16 votes

Rate EPYC 9655 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron E3300 or EPYC 9655, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.