C-50 vs Celeron G1101
Primary details
Comparing Celeron G1101 and C-50 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
Place in the ranking | 2717 | not rated |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 0.97 | no data |
Market segment | Desktop processor | Laptop |
Series | no data | AMD C-Series |
Power efficiency | 0.89 | no data |
Architecture codename | Clarkdale (2010−2011) | Ontario (2011−2012) |
Release date | 7 January 2010 (14 years ago) | 4 January 2011 (13 years ago) |
Launch price (MSRP) | $85 | no data |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Detailed specifications
Celeron G1101 and C-50 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 2 (Dual-core) |
Threads | 2 | 2 |
Base clock speed | 2.26 GHz | no data |
Boost clock speed | 0.27 GHz | 1 GHz |
L1 cache | 64 KB (per core) | 64K (per core) |
L2 cache | 256 KB (per core) | 512K (per core) |
L3 cache | 2 MB (shared) | 0 KB |
Chip lithography | 32 nm | 40 nm |
Die size | 81 mm2 | 75 mm2 |
Number of transistors | 382 million | no data |
64 bit support | + | + |
Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Compatibility
Information on Celeron G1101 and C-50 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
Socket | FCLGA1156 | FT1 BGA 413-Ball |
Power consumption (TDP) | 73 Watt | 9 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron G1101 and C-50. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
Instruction set extensions | no data | MMX(+), SSE(1,2,3,3S,4A), AMD-V |
vPro | - | no data |
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | no data |
Turbo Boost Technology | - | no data |
Hyper-Threading Technology | - | no data |
Idle States | + | no data |
Demand Based Switching | - | no data |
PAE | 36 Bit | no data |
FDI | + | no data |
Security technologies
Celeron G1101 and C-50 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
TXT | - | no data |
EDB | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron G1101 and C-50 are enumerated here.
AMD-V | - | + |
VT-d | - | no data |
VT-x | + | no data |
EPT | + | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron G1101 and C-50. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
Supported memory types | DDR3 | DDR3 Single-channel |
Maximum memory size | 16.38 GB | no data |
Max memory channels | 2 | no data |
Maximum memory bandwidth | 17 GB/s | no data |
ECC memory support | + | - |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
Integrated graphics card | Intel HD | AMD Radeon HD 6250 |
Graphics interfaces
Available interfaces and connections of Celeron G1101 and C-50 integrated GPUs.
Number of displays supported | 2 | no data |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron G1101 and C-50.
PCIe version | 2.0 | no data |
PCI Express lanes | 1 | no data |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.
Pros & cons summary
Recency | 7 January 2010 | 4 January 2011 |
Chip lithography | 32 nm | 40 nm |
Power consumption (TDP) | 73 Watt | 9 Watt |
Celeron G1101 has a 25% more advanced lithography process.
C-50, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 11 months, and 711.1% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Celeron G1101 and C-50. We've got no test results to judge.
Note that Celeron G1101 is a desktop processor while C-50 is a notebook one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron G1101 and C-50, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.