Celeron Dual-Core T1400 vs E3300
Aggregate performance score
Celeron E3300 outperforms Celeron Dual-Core T1400 by a moderate 19% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing Celeron E3300 and Celeron Dual-Core T1400 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
Place in the ranking | 2894 | 2977 |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 0.83 | no data |
Market segment | Desktop processor | Laptop |
Series | no data | Intel Celeron Dual-Core |
Power efficiency | 0.73 | 1.14 |
Architecture codename | Wolfdale (2008−2010) | Merom-2M (2008) |
Release date | 30 August 2009 (15 years ago) | 1 May 2008 (16 years ago) |
Launch price (MSRP) | $70 | no data |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Detailed specifications
Celeron E3300 and Celeron Dual-Core T1400 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 2 (Dual-core) |
Threads | 2 | 2 |
Base clock speed | 2.5 GHz | no data |
Boost clock speed | 2.5 GHz | 1.73 GHz |
Bus rate | no data | 533 MHz |
L1 cache | 64 KB (per core) | no data |
L2 cache | 1 MB (shared) | 512 KB |
L3 cache | 0 KB | no data |
Chip lithography | 45 nm | 65 nm |
Die size | 82 mm2 | no data |
Maximum core temperature | 74 °C | 100 °C |
Number of transistors | 228 million | no data |
64 bit support | + | + |
Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
VID voltage range | 0.85V-1.3625V | no data |
Compatibility
Information on Celeron E3300 and Celeron Dual-Core T1400 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | no data |
Socket | LGA775 | P |
Power consumption (TDP) | 65 Watt | 35 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron E3300 and Celeron Dual-Core T1400. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | no data |
Turbo Boost Technology | - | no data |
Hyper-Threading Technology | - | no data |
Idle States | + | no data |
Thermal Monitoring | + | - |
Security technologies
Celeron E3300 and Celeron Dual-Core T1400 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
TXT | - | no data |
EDB | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron E3300 and Celeron Dual-Core T1400 are enumerated here.
VT-d | - | no data |
VT-x | + | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron E3300 and Celeron Dual-Core T1400. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
Supported memory types | DDR1, DDR2, DDR3 | no data |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
Integrated graphics card | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | no data |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron E3300 and Celeron Dual-Core T1400.
PCIe version | 2.0 | no data |
Pros & cons summary
Performance score | 0.50 | 0.42 |
Recency | 30 August 2009 | 1 May 2008 |
Chip lithography | 45 nm | 65 nm |
Power consumption (TDP) | 65 Watt | 35 Watt |
Celeron E3300 has a 19% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 1 year, and a 44.4% more advanced lithography process.
Celeron Dual-Core T1400, on the other hand, has 85.7% lower power consumption.
The Celeron E3300 is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron Dual-Core T1400 in performance tests.
Note that Celeron E3300 is a desktop processor while Celeron Dual-Core T1400 is a notebook one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron E3300 and Celeron Dual-Core T1400, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.