Athlon X2 BE-2400 vs Celeron E1400

VS

Aggregate performance score

Celeron E1400
2008
2 cores / 2 threads, 65 Watt
0.46
+9.5%
Athlon X2 BE-2400
2007
2 cores / 2 threads, 45 Watt
0.42

Celeron E1400 outperforms Athlon X2 BE-2400 by a moderate 10% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Celeron E1400 and Athlon X2 BE-2400 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking29352982
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
Power efficiency0.670.88
Architecture codenameAllendale (2006−2009)Brisbane (2007−2008)
Release dateApril 2008 (16 years ago)October 2007 (17 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$57no data

Detailed specifications

Celeron E1400 and Athlon X2 BE-2400 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads22
Base clock speed2 GHzno data
Boost clock speed2 GHz2.3 GHz
L1 cache64 KB (per core)256 KB
L2 cache512 KB (shared)512 KB
L3 cache0 KB0 KB
Chip lithography65 nm65 nm
Die size77 mm2126 mm2
Maximum core temperature73 °Cno data
Number of transistors105 million154 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
VID voltage range0.85V-1.5Vno data

Compatibility

Information on Celeron E1400 and Athlon X2 BE-2400 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketLGA775AM2
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt45 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron E1400 and Athlon X2 BE-2400. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Demand Based Switching-no data
FSB parity-no data

Security technologies

Celeron E1400 and Athlon X2 BE-2400 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron E1400 and Athlon X2 BE-2400 are enumerated here.

VT-d-no data
VT-x-no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron E1400 and Athlon X2 BE-2400. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR1, DDR2, DDR3no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Celeron E1400 0.46
+9.5%
Athlon X2 BE-2400 0.42

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Celeron E1400 735
+9.1%
Athlon X2 BE-2400 674

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.46 0.42
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 45 Watt

Celeron E1400 has a 9.5% higher aggregate performance score.

Athlon X2 BE-2400, on the other hand, has 44.4% lower power consumption.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Celeron E1400 and Athlon X2 BE-2400.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron E1400 and Athlon X2 BE-2400, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron E1400
Celeron E1400
AMD Athlon X2 BE-2400
Athlon X2 BE-2400

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.6 63 votes

Rate Celeron E1400 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 4 votes

Rate Athlon X2 BE-2400 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron E1400 or Athlon X2 BE-2400, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.