Celeron 430 vs Dual-Core T3500

VS

Aggregate performance score

Celeron Dual-Core T3500
2010
2 cores / 2 threads, 35 Watt
0.80
+344%
Celeron 430
2007
1 core / 1 thread, 35 Watt
0.18

Celeron Dual-Core T3500 outperforms Celeron 430 by a whopping 344% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Celeron Dual-Core T3500 and Celeron 430 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking26153260
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
SeriesIntel Celeron Dual-Coreno data
Power efficiency2.160.49
Architecture codenamePenryn (2008−2011)Conroe-L (2007−2008)
Release date26 September 2010 (14 years ago)June 2007 (17 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$80$50

Detailed specifications

Celeron Dual-Core T3500 and Celeron 430 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads21
Base clock speedno data1.8 GHz
Boost clock speed2.1 GHz1.8 GHz
Bus rate800 MHzno data
L1 cache128 KB64 KB
L2 cache1 MB512 KB
L3 cacheno data0 KB
Chip lithography45 nm65 nm
Die size107 mm277 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data60 °C
Number of transistors410 Million105 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
VID voltage rangeno data1V-1.3375V

Compatibility

Information on Celeron Dual-Core T3500 and Celeron 430 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
SocketSocket P PGA478LGA775
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron Dual-Core T3500 and Celeron 430. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data-
Turbo Boost Technologyno data-
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data-
Idle Statesno data-
Thermal Monitoring-+
Demand Based Switchingno data-
FSB parityno data-

Security technologies

Celeron Dual-Core T3500 and Celeron 430 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data-
EDB++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron Dual-Core T3500 and Celeron 430 are enumerated here.

VT-dno data-
VT-xno data-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron Dual-Core T3500 and Celeron 430. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR1, DDR2, DDR3

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Celeron Dual-Core T3500 0.80
+344%
Celeron 430 0.18

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Celeron Dual-Core T3500 1275
+341%
Celeron 430 289

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.80 0.18
Physical cores 2 1
Threads 2 1
Chip lithography 45 nm 65 nm

Celeron Dual-Core T3500 has a 344.4% higher aggregate performance score, 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, and a 44.4% more advanced lithography process.

The Celeron Dual-Core T3500 is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron 430 in performance tests.

Be aware that Celeron Dual-Core T3500 is a notebook processor while Celeron 430 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron Dual-Core T3500 and Celeron 430, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron Dual-Core T3500
Celeron Dual-Core T3500
Intel Celeron 430
Celeron 430

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.1 106 votes

Rate Celeron Dual-Core T3500 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.6 160 votes

Rate Celeron 430 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron Dual-Core T3500 or Celeron 430, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.