Processor N200 vs Celeron Dual-Core T3300

Place in the ranking	3006	2122
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Market segment	Laptop	Laptop
Series	Intel Celeron Dual-Core	Intel Alder Lake-N
Power efficiency	1.08	24.62
Architecture codename	Penryn (2008−2011)	Alder Lake-N (2023)
Release date	1 February 2010 (14 years ago)	3 January 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	no data	$193

Detailed specifications

Celeron Dual-Core T3300 and Processor N200 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores	2 (Dual-core)	4 (Quad-Core)
Threads	2	4
Base clock speed	no data	0.1 GHz
Boost clock speed	2 GHz	3.7 GHz
Bus rate	800 MHz	no data
L1 cache	128 KB	96 KB (per core)
L2 cache	1 MB	2 MB (shared)
L3 cache	no data	6 MB (shared)
Chip lithography	45 nm	10 nm
Maximum core temperature	no data	105 °C
64 bit support	+	+
Windows 11 compatibility	-	+

Compatibility

Information on Celeron Dual-Core T3300 and Processor N200 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration	no data	1
Socket	Socket P 478	Intel BGA 1264
Power consumption (TDP)	35 Watt	6 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron Dual-Core T3300 and Processor N200. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI	-	+
AVX	-	+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)	no data	+

Security technologies

Celeron Dual-Core T3300 and Processor N200 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT	no data	+
EDB	+	no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron Dual-Core T3300 and Processor N200 are enumerated here.

VT-d	no data	+
VT-x	no data	+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron Dual-Core T3300 and Processor N200. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory types

no data

DDR4, DDR5 4800 MHz Single-channel

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card

no data

Intel UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake) (450 - 750 MHz)

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron Dual-Core T3300 and Processor N200.

PCIe version	no data	3.0
PCI Express lanes	no data	9

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	0.40	1.56
Recency	1 February 2010	3 January 2023
Physical cores	2	4
Threads	2	4
Chip lithography	45 nm	10 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	35 Watt	6 Watt

Processor N200 has a 290% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 12 years, 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, a 350% more advanced lithography process, and 483.3% lower power consumption.

The Processor N200 is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron Dual-Core T3300 in performance tests.

Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron Dual-Core T3300 and Processor N200, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.