Itanium 9760 vs Celeron Dual-Core T3000
Primary details
Comparing Celeron Dual-Core T3000 and Itanium 9760 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | not rated | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Server |
| Series | Intel Celeron Dual-Core | no data |
| Architecture codename | Penryn-1M (2009) | no data |
| Release date | 1 May 2009 (15 years ago) | 1 April 2017 (7 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Celeron Dual-Core T3000 and Itanium 9760 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 8 (Octa-Core) |
| Threads | 2 | 16 |
| Base clock speed | no data | 2.66 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1.8 GHz | no data |
| Bus rate | 800 MHz | 6.4 GT/s |
| L1 cache | 64 KB | no data |
| L2 cache | 1 MB | no data |
| L3 cache | no data | 32 MB |
| Chip lithography | 45 nm | 32 nm |
| Die size | 107 mm2 | no data |
| Maximum core temperature | 105 °C | 95 °C |
| Number of transistors | 410 Million | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | - |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Compatibility
Information on Celeron Dual-Core T3000 and Itanium 9760 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Socket | P (478) | LGA1248 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | 170 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron Dual-Core T3000 and Itanium 9760. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | + |
| Turbo Boost Technology | no data | 2.0 |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | no data | + |
Security technologies
Celeron Dual-Core T3000 and Itanium 9760 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| EDB | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron Dual-Core T3000 and Itanium 9760 are enumerated here.
| VT-d | no data | + |
| VT-x | no data | + |
| VT-i | no data | + |
| EPT | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron Dual-Core T3000 and Itanium 9760. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| ECC memory support | - | + |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 1 May 2009 | 1 April 2017 |
| Physical cores | 2 | 8 |
| Threads | 2 | 16 |
| Chip lithography | 45 nm | 32 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | 170 Watt |
Celeron Dual-Core T3000 has 385.7% lower power consumption.
Itanium 9760, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 7 years, 300% more physical cores and 700% more threads, and a 40.6% more advanced lithography process.
We couldn't decide between Celeron Dual-Core T3000 and Itanium 9760. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Celeron Dual-Core T3000 is a notebook processor while Itanium 9760 is a server/workstation one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron Dual-Core T3000 and Itanium 9760, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
