Turion Neo X2 L625 vs Celeron D 341
Primary details
Comparing Celeron D 341 and Turion Neo X2 L625 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | not rated | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Laptop |
| Series | no data | 2x AMD Turion Neo |
| Architecture codename | Prescott (2001−2005) | Congo (2009) |
| Release date | September 2004 (20 years ago) | 1 October 2009 (15 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Celeron D 341 and Turion Neo X2 L625 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 1 (Single-Core) | 2 (Dual-core) |
| Threads | 1 | 2 |
| Base clock speed | 2.93 GHz | no data |
| Boost clock speed | 2.93 GHz | 1.6 GHz |
| Bus rate | no data | 800 MHz |
| L1 cache | 16 KB | 128 KB |
| L2 cache | 256 KB | 1 MB |
| L3 cache | 0 KB | no data |
| Chip lithography | 90 nm | 65 nm |
| Die size | 109 mm2 | no data |
| Maximum core temperature | 68 °C | 95 °C |
| Number of transistors | 125 million | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
| VID voltage range | 1.25V-1.4V | no data |
Compatibility
Information on Celeron D 341 and Turion Neo X2 L625 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | no data |
| Socket | PLGA478,PLGA775 | ASB1 BGA |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 84 Watt | 18 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron D 341 and Turion Neo X2 L625. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | no data | HyperTransport 3.0, SSE3, AMD64, Enhanced Virus Protection |
| VirusProtect | - | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | - | no data |
| Turbo Boost Technology | - | no data |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | - | no data |
| Idle States | + | no data |
| Demand Based Switching | - | no data |
| PAE | 32 Bit | no data |
| FSB parity | - | no data |
Security technologies
Celeron D 341 and Turion Neo X2 L625 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | - | no data |
| EDB | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron D 341 and Turion Neo X2 L625 are enumerated here.
| VT-x | - | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron D 341 and Turion Neo X2 L625. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR1, DDR2, DDR3 | no data |
Pros & cons summary
| Physical cores | 1 | 2 |
| Threads | 1 | 2 |
| Chip lithography | 90 nm | 65 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 84 Watt | 18 Watt |
Turion Neo X2 L625 has 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, a 38.5% more advanced lithography process, and 366.7% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Celeron D 341 and Turion Neo X2 L625. We've got no test results to judge.
Note that Celeron D 341 is a desktop processor while Turion Neo X2 L625 is a notebook one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron D 341 and Turion Neo X2 L625, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
