EPYC 7643 vs Celeron B840

VS

Aggregate performance score

Celeron B840
2011
2 cores / 2 threads, 35 Watt
0.61
EPYC 7643
2021
48 cores / 96 threads, 225 Watt
47.88
+7749%

EPYC 7643 outperforms Celeron B840 by a whopping 7749% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Celeron B840 and EPYC 7643 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking278639
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data6.37
Market segmentLaptopServer
SeriesIntel CeleronAMD EPYC
Power efficiency1.6520.14
Architecture codenameSandy Bridge (2011−2013)Milan (2021−2023)
Release date1 July 2011 (13 years ago)15 March 2021 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$86$4,995

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Celeron B840 and EPYC 7643 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)48 (Octatetraconta-Core)
Threads296
Base clock speed1.9 GHz2.3 GHz
Boost clock speed1.9 GHz3.6 GHz
Bus typeDMI 2.0no data
Bus rate4 × 5 GT/sno data
Multiplier1923
L1 cache64K (per core)64 KB (per core)
L2 cache256K (per core)512 KB (per core)
L3 cache2 MB (shared)256 MB (shared)
Chip lithography32 nm7 nm+
Die size131 mm28x 81 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °Cno data
Number of transistors504 million33,200 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+

Compatibility

Information on Celeron B840 and EPYC 7643 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)2
SocketFCPGA988,PGA988SP3
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt225 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron B840 and EPYC 7643. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI-+
FMA+-
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
My WiFi+no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Flex Memory Access+no data
Demand Based Switching-no data
FDI+no data
Fast Memory Access+no data

Security technologies

Celeron B840 and EPYC 7643 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB+no data
Anti-Theft-no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron B840 and EPYC 7643 are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d-no data
VT-x+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron B840 and EPYC 7643. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR4-3200
Maximum memory size16 GB4 TiB
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth21.335 GB/s204.795 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel® HD Graphics for 2nd Generation Intel® ProcessorsN/A
Graphics max frequency1 GHzno data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Celeron B840 and EPYC 7643 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported2no data
eDP+no data
DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-
SDVO+no data
CRT+no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron B840 and EPYC 7643.

PCIe version2.04.0
PCI Express lanes16128

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Celeron B840 0.61
EPYC 7643 47.88
+7749%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Celeron B840 967
EPYC 7643 76050
+7765%

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Celeron B840 328
EPYC 7643 1237
+277%

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Celeron B840 597
EPYC 7643 11421
+1813%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.61 47.88
Recency 1 July 2011 15 March 2021
Physical cores 2 48
Threads 2 96
Chip lithography 32 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 225 Watt

Celeron B840 has 542.9% lower power consumption.

EPYC 7643, on the other hand, has a 7749.2% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 9 years, 2300% more physical cores and 4700% more threads, and a 357.1% more advanced lithography process.

The EPYC 7643 is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron B840 in performance tests.

Be aware that Celeron B840 is a notebook processor while EPYC 7643 is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron B840 and EPYC 7643, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron B840
Celeron B840
AMD EPYC 7643
EPYC 7643

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


1.9 17 votes

Rate Celeron B840 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
1.2 232 votes

Rate EPYC 7643 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron B840 or EPYC 7643, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.