Celeron B840 vs A6 Pro-7050B

VS

Aggregate performance score

A6 Pro-7050B
2014
2 cores / 2 threads, 17 Watt
0.64
+4.9%
Celeron B840
2011
2 cores / 2 threads, 35 Watt
0.61

A6 Pro-7050B outperforms Celeron B840 by a small 5% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing A6 Pro-7050B and Celeron B840 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking27792801
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesAMD KaveriIntel Celeron
Power efficiency3.561.65
Architecture codenameKaveri (2014−2015)Sandy Bridge (2011−2013)
Release date4 June 2014 (10 years ago)1 July 2011 (13 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$86

Detailed specifications

A6 Pro-7050B and Celeron B840 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads22
Base clock speed2.2 GHzno data
Boost clock speed3 GHz1.9 GHz
Bus typeno dataDMI 2.0
Bus rateno data4 × 5 GT/s
Multiplierno data19
L1 cacheno data64K (per core)
L2 cache1024 KB256K (per core)
L3 cacheno data2 MB (shared)
Chip lithography28 nm32 nm
Die size245 mm2131 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data100 °C
Number of transistors2410 Million504 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on A6 Pro-7050B and Celeron B840 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1 (Uniprocessor)
SocketFP3G2 (988B)
Power consumption (TDP)17 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by A6 Pro-7050B and Celeron B840. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensions86x SSE (1, 2, 3, 3S, 4.1, 4.2, 4A),-64, AES, AVX, FMAno data
AES-NI+-
FMA++
AVX+-
FRTC+-
TrueAudio+-
PowerNow+-
PowerGating+-
Out-of-band client management+-
VirusProtect+-
RAID+-
HSA+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Idle Statesno data+
Thermal Monitoring-+

Security technologies

A6 Pro-7050B and Celeron B840 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

EDBno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by A6 Pro-7050B and Celeron B840 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-xno data+
IOMMU 2.0+-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by A6 Pro-7050B and Celeron B840. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3-1600DDR3
Maximum memory sizeno data16 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidthno data21.335 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
AMD Radeon R4 GraphicsIntel HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge) (650 - 950 MHz)
iGPU core count3no data
จำนวนพาธไลน์192no data
Enduro+-
Switchable graphics+-
UVD+-
VCE+-

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of A6 Pro-7050B and Celeron B840 integrated GPUs.

DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-

Graphics API support

APIs supported by A6 Pro-7050B and Celeron B840 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXDirectX® 12no data
Vulkan+-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by A6 Pro-7050B and Celeron B840.

PCIe version3.0no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

A6 Pro-7050B 0.64
+4.9%
Celeron B840 0.61

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

A6 Pro-7050B 1010
+4.4%
Celeron B840 967

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.64 0.61
Recency 4 June 2014 1 July 2011
Chip lithography 28 nm 32 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 17 Watt 35 Watt

A6 Pro-7050B has a 4.9% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 2 years, a 14.3% more advanced lithography process, and 105.9% lower power consumption.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between A6 Pro-7050B and Celeron B840.


Should you still have questions on choice between A6 Pro-7050B and Celeron B840, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD A6 Pro-7050B
A6 Pro-7050B
Intel Celeron B840
Celeron B840

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.7 55 votes

Rate A6 Pro-7050B on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
1.9 17 votes

Rate Celeron B840 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about A6 Pro-7050B or Celeron B840, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.