EPYC 72F3 vs Celeron 900

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing Celeron 900 and EPYC 72F3 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot rated366
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data4.64
Market segmentLaptopServer
Seriesno dataAMD EPYC
Power efficiencyno data9.02
Architecture codenameno dataMilan (2021−2023)
Release date1 January 2009 (15 years ago)15 March 2021 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$2,468

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Celeron 900 and EPYC 72F3 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical coresno data8 (Octa-Core)
Threadsno data16
Base clock speed2.2 GHz3.7 GHz
Boost clock speedno data4.1 GHz
Multiplierno data37
L1 cacheno data64 KB (per core)
L2 cacheno data512 KB (per core)
L3 cache1 MB L2 Cache256 MB (shared)
Chip lithography45 nm7 nm+
Die sizeno data8x 81 mm2
Maximum core temperature105 °Cno data
Number of transistorsno data33,200 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+

Compatibility

Information on Celeron 900 and EPYC 72F3 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data2
SocketPGA478SP3
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt180 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron 900 and EPYC 72F3. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI-+
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)-no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data

Security technologies

Celeron 900 and EPYC 72F3 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron 900 and EPYC 72F3 are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-x-no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron 900 and EPYC 72F3. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR4-3200
Maximum memory sizeno data4 TiB
Maximum memory bandwidthno data204.795 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataN/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron 900 and EPYC 72F3.

PCIe versionno data4.0
PCI Express lanesno data128

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.



Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Celeron 900 410
EPYC 72F3 27252
+6547%

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 January 2009 15 March 2021
Chip lithography 45 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 180 Watt

Celeron 900 has 414.3% lower power consumption.

EPYC 72F3, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 12 years, and a 542.9% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Celeron 900 and EPYC 72F3. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Celeron 900 is a notebook processor while EPYC 72F3 is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron 900 and EPYC 72F3, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron 900
Celeron 900
AMD EPYC 72F3
EPYC 72F3

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.4 53 votes

Rate Celeron 900 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 6 votes

Rate EPYC 72F3 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron 900 or EPYC 72F3, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.