N100 vs Celeron 6305

VS

Aggregate performance score

Celeron 6305
2020
2 cores / 2 threads, 15 Watt
1.31

N100 outperforms Celeron 6305 by a whopping 164% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Celeron 6305 and N100 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking22601538
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel Tiger Lakeno data
Power efficiency8.2654.57
Architecture codenameTiger Lake-U (2020)no data
Release date1 September 2020 (4 years ago)1 January 2023 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

Celeron 6305 and N100 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)no data
Threads24
Boost clock speed1.8 GHz3.4 GHz
Bus rate4 GT/sno data
L1 cache160 KBno data
L2 cache2.5 MBno data
L3 cache4 MB6 MB Intel® Smart Cache
Chip lithography10 nm SuperFinIntel 7 nm
Maximum core temperature100 °C105 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+no data

Compatibility

Information on Celeron 6305 and N100 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCBGA1449FCBGA1264
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt6 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron 6305 and N100. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2
AES-NI++
AVX+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Speed Shift++
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology--
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring++
GPIOno data+
Deep Learning Boost+-

Security technologies

Celeron 6305 and N100 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
SGX-no data
OS Guard++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron 6305 and N100 are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron 6305 and N100. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4DDR4-3200, DDR5-4800, LPDDR5-4800
Maximum memory size64 GB16 GB
Max memory channels21

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel UHD Graphics for 11th Gen Intel ProcessorsIntel UHD Graphics
Quick Sync Video++
Clear Video HD+no data
Graphics max frequency1.25 GHz750 MHz
Execution Units4824

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Celeron 6305 and N100 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported43

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Celeron 6305 and N100 integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

4K resolution supportno data+
Max resolution over HDMI 1.44096x2304@60Hz4096 x 2160@60Hz
Max resolution over eDP4096x2304@60Hzno data
Max resolution over DisplayPort7680x4320@60Hz4096 x 2160@60Hz

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Celeron 6305 and N100 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX12.112.1
OpenGL4.64.6

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron 6305 and N100.

PCI Express lanesno data9
USB revisionno data2.0/3.2

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Celeron 6305 1.31
N100 3.46
+164%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Celeron 6305 2080
N100 5497
+164%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.31 3.46
Recency 1 September 2020 1 January 2023
Threads 2 4
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 6 Watt

N100 has a 164.1% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 2 years, 100% more threads, and 150% lower power consumption.

The N100 is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron 6305 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron 6305 and N100, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron 6305
Celeron 6305
Intel N100
N100

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 147 votes

Rate Celeron 6305 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 183 votes

Rate N100 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron 6305 or N100, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.