EPYC 9655P vs Celeron 600

VS

Aggregate performance score

Celeron 600
1 core / 1 thread, 30 Watt
0.09
EPYC 9655P
2024
96 cores / 192 threads, 400 Watt
100.00
+111011%

EPYC 9655P outperforms Celeron 600 by a whopping 111011% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Celeron 600 and EPYC 9655P processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking33891
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data2.62
Market segmentDesktop processorServer
Power efficiency0.2823.64
Architecture codenameTimnaTurin (2024)
Release dateno data10 October 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$10,811

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Celeron 600 and EPYC 9655P basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)96
Threads1192
Base clock speedno data2.6 GHz
Boost clock speed0.6 GHz4.5 GHz
L1 cache32 KB80 KB (per core)
L2 cache128 KB1 MB (per core)
L3 cacheno data384 MB (shared)
Chip lithography180 nm4 nm
Die size129 mm212x 70.6 mm2
Number of transistorsno data99,780 million
64 bit support-+

Compatibility

Information on Celeron 600 and EPYC 9655P compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
Socket370SSP5
Power consumption (TDP)30 Watt400 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron 600 and EPYC 9655P. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI-+
AVX-+
Precision Boost 2no data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron 600 and EPYC 9655P are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron 600 and EPYC 9655P. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR5

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel i752N/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron 600 and EPYC 9655P.

PCIe versionno data5.0
PCI Express lanesno data128

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Celeron 600 0.09
EPYC 9655P 100.00
+111011%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Celeron 600 147
EPYC 9655P 158845
+107958%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.09 100.00
Physical cores 1 96
Threads 1 192
Chip lithography 180 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 30 Watt 400 Watt

Celeron 600 has 1233.3% lower power consumption.

EPYC 9655P, on the other hand, has a 111011.1% higher aggregate performance score, 9500% more physical cores and 19100% more threads, and a 4400% more advanced lithography process.

The EPYC 9655P is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron 600 in performance tests.

Note that Celeron 600 is a desktop processor while EPYC 9655P is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron 600 and EPYC 9655P, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron 600
Celeron 600
AMD EPYC 9655P
EPYC 9655P

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 3 votes

Rate Celeron 600 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 215 votes

Rate EPYC 9655P on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron 600 or EPYC 9655P, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.